HT 1589 

/ 

| .L3 


Copy 1 

|:| 


PAMPHLET COLLECTION 
LIBRARY OF CONOEHSS 


RACES 

OR 

Baptists vs. World Evils 



BY 

REV. J. R. LAMB 

FOUNDER AND NATIONAL PRESIDENT OF THE 

TRUE AMERICAN LEAGUE OF THE WHITE 
BROTHERHOOD OF THE WORLD. 

EUFAULA, OKLA. 




BAPTISTS: 


Arise and send out the light. The 
world is taking a fearful leap into 
the dark. America is falling. “A 
nation divided against itself can not 
stand.” Who is to be THE LIGHT 
of the WORLD in this age of civic 
and spiritual darkness? Who is to 
be the “SALT of the EARTH” in 
this time of political decay and 
moral and social rottenness? If not 
Baptists, then who? Let Baptists 
lead and God’s whole family will 
follow. 


S>&a630493 


OCT -G 192! 













—O 


INTRODUCTORY 

In introducing this work to Baptists, I beg to submit to the 
great Baptist fraternity, a brief sketch of my life, and of the or¬ 
ganization which I founded and of the sacrifices I have made for its 
promotion. I was bom of Methodist parents, in Tennessee, April 
25, 1862. My mother was a Union woman, my father was-a Con¬ 
federate soldier. On December 20, 1880, I was converted, and 
joined the Baptist church at Pine Spring. I was licensed to preach 
in October, 1883, and ordained September 16, 1884. Notwithstand¬ 
ing my unworthiness and many mistakes, I have never had a charge 
preferred against me before any church. I prize nty standing with 
my church above all the honors of financial success, or political 
achievement or ascribed ability as a writer, or preacher, or as the 
founder of an organization, notwithstanding I sincerely believe that 
TRUE AMERICANISM and WHITE FRATERNALISM was given 
to me of God, not by direct inspiration, but through a proper under¬ 
standing of the Bible. 

On arrival at lawful age I affiliated myself with the Democratic 
party. So, lo, Here I am, a Baptist and a Democrat; an ordained 
preacher; owning and operating three small farms here in McIntosh 
county, Oklahoma; and still struggling to bring TRUE AMERICAN¬ 
ISM and WHITE RACE FRATERNALISM before the world, core- 
casting the only political regime under which Christianity may pros¬ 
per without hindrance, and exert its full power as the true ‘Tight 
of the world" and the “salt of the earth” spiritually, morally, polit¬ 
ically and socially. 

A STRANGE EXPERIENCE 

If any man ever felt an undeniable calling to the ministry, God 
knows I did in early life: and to this awful sense of duty I humbly 
responded. While engaged in pastoral work in Jackson county, Ala., 
from 1898 to 1908. I became deeply impressed with the conditions 
in America, politically, racially, morally, economically, socially, and 
religiously; and with this recognition of national evils, was a grow¬ 
ing desire to see and promote Bible remedies. This unsought desire 
to search out and systematize a standard of political government 
that would annihilate these evils, and give Christianity a free 
course, continued to increase within me until it controlled me to the 
exclusion of every other conviction of duty. I could study nothing 
else. I sensibly felt my calling to pastoral work leave me. I was 
impelled to the study of Scriptural politics; the divine standard of 
civil government. I came to feel this to be my “one thing” to do, 
the supreme duty which I owed to God and man. With this convict¬ 
ion of duty to search out and formulate a system of Scriptural polit¬ 
ical doctrines, I moved from Trenton, Ala., to Aragon, Ga., in March 
1908 , and there on the night of April 9 , 1909 , organized the first 
local lodge of the TRUE AMERICAN LEAGUE OF THE WHITE 
BROTHERHOOD OF THE WORLD. 


SACRIFICE AND CRUCIFIXION 

At Aragon, Ga., I permitted the First Baptist church to per¬ 
suade me to accept its pastorate, although I felt no impelling sense 
of duty dictating its acceptance. My whole bent was toward the 
founding and extension of the True American League to combat the 
-deep rooted national and world evils which directly oppose the true 
light, power and progress of a pur e Christianity. Not having suffic¬ 
ient money to buy a respectable house and lot, with enough left to 
start the True American movement and to put it on its feet, I chose 
to lease a dingy cottage as a dwelling, and to put my money into 
the movement. For a while the organization prospered, but fric¬ 
tion among its national leaders soon ended its progress in extension 
work, but its doctrines have spread to the civilized world, while the 
name of the organization and its founder are practically unknown to 
the public. Since 1911, in which year I moved to the historic State 
of Oklahoma, I have only been able to keep the organization alive 
at its headquarters at Eufaula, with no national officers except the 
national president and the national secretary. Few local lodges re¬ 
main . But with this small force to co-operate with me, I have, par¬ 
ticularly since 1914, kept the doctrines and policies of the True 
American League before President Woodrow Wilson and every de¬ 
partment of the Federal Government, and before the governors of 
the States. And while Federal Government officials at Washington 
have given the proposition favorable consideration, machine politic¬ 
ians have either adopted a part of the policies as campaign dope, all 
to their own credit, or sought to destroy the organization in fear 
that it might prove “a lead off from the party.” This is particularly 
true of the leaders of the Democrats of Oklahoma. While th e rank 
and file of the party has in the great majority, approved the entire 
system of True Americanism, the machine party leaders of the State 
have taken all treacherous, unfair means to ‘'strangle the organiza¬ 
tion in its cradle,” and to “hold its founder in obscurity.” By this 
subtle craft my own party has prevented the spread of th e organiza¬ 
tion in this State. They have repeatedly promised to aid me in ex¬ 
tending the organization, only to deceive me, and to betray the trust 
I renospH in them. In this manner all my plans have been thwarted, 
my money spent in vain, and the organization kept out of the State, 
while autocracy reigns under the guise of democracy, and the citi¬ 
zens turn in disgust from the party, and take their chances with the 
Republicans or Socialists. At their hands I have dearly paid for my 
attempt to introduce true American ideals into my State and my 
party. Deceived, defeated, financially injured, and socially cruci¬ 
fied. Still, overpowered, I am not conquered. Crucified, but not 
dead. Financially injured, but not broke. Never were the pros¬ 
pects for the True American League brighter than today. The re¬ 
sults of the General Election of November 2, 1920, have created a 

( 2 ) 


nation-wide necessity for the organization, and opened the way for 
the accomplishment of its objects. 

APPEAL TO BAPTISTS 

As a Baptist, I appeal to my brethren to examine the system of 
POLITICAL BIBLE DOCTRINES which I, as a member of the 
great “one body” of Baptists, have originated and systematized. If 
you find it to be the Democracy of the Bible, written in the true 
Baptist -spirit, then I entreat you in the name of Christ, our one and 
only master, to throw your whole power behind it and let us spread 
it over the world. 

I do not expect you to adopt it as an addendum to the common¬ 
ly accepted system of distinctive Baptist doctrines, nor as a denomi¬ 
national work, but as good citizens, to identify yourselves with it as. 
a non-partisan political organization, which has as its object the 
annihilation of national evils, and the inauguration of the reign of 
civic righteousness, which I think, should characterize any enlight¬ 
ened Christian republic. I do not ask of you to abandon your po¬ 
litical parties, although I think they are all more or less corrupt, and 
injurious to the peace and morals of our nation. But the espousal 
of True Americanism will regenerate the conscious member of any 
political party. Study the system, then decide. 

EVILS OF AMERICA 

The chief evils that are destroying the American people, and 
against which I have pitted the True American Leagne, are as fol¬ 
lows: (1) RACE MONGRELISM, or the amalgamation of races 

of different color. Against the social mingling of races the True 
American League pits the policy of RACE UNITY IN MARRIAGE, 
and the TERRITORIAL SEPARATION OF RACES distinctly differ¬ 
ent in color. 

DOES CHRISTIANITY ENJOIN RACIAL EQUALITY? 

Does the Bible teach that all races sprang from Adam? If so, 
then American Christianity, particularly in the Southern States, is 
on direct oppcstion to. the word and Spirit of God in compelling the 
Negroes to assemble in separate congregations for the worship of 
God? Come now, brother Baptist, and let us examine the word of 
God and see whether we have fallen into a great sin in discriminat¬ 
ing between the races on account of color. 

A “BEAST” WITH A “HUMAN SOUL” 

I desire to be understood to believe and teach that the Negro is 
a human being, possessed of soul and spirit; a subject of redemption 
and responsible to laws and subject to penalties, civil and divine, and 
liable to future rewards and punishments. I would as clearly be 
understood to believe and teach, that according to the Bible account 
of creation, the Negro was created prior to Adam, during the earlier 
part of the sixth period of creation, and that to distinguish the 

( 3 ) 


Negro from the Adamic race, which alone was ‘‘created in the image 
of God/’ inspiration calls the Negro the “Beast of the Earth”; the 
“Beast of the Field”; or “The Beast.” 

This fact is positively stated in th e following passages. 

“And God said, Let the earth bring forth th e living creature 
after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth af¬ 
ter his kind: and it was so.” 

“And God made the Beast of the Earth after his kind, and cat¬ 
tle after their kind, and every thing that ereepeth upon the earth 
after his kind: and God saw that it was good. And God said, Let us 
make man in our image.”—Gen. 1:24,25. 

Analysis of these verses, with verses 20-23, shows FIVE dis¬ 
tinct ORDERS of CREATION, as follows: 

(1) Fowls and fishes. Verses 20-23. 

(2) “Living creatures and creeping things,” (verse 24) wild 
animals and reptiles. 

(3) “Cattle,” (verse 24) domestic animals generally. (See the 
word “cattle” in Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary.. 

(4) “Beast of the Earth.” (verse 24) the colored races, the 
black and yellow peoples. 

DESCRIPTION OF THE HUMAN “BEAST** 

(T) This beast has “hands.” (2) Commits murder. (3) 
Commits fornication with members of the white race. (4) Con¬ 
verses in human language. (5) Reigns as king. (6) Accountable 
to God for his iniquity, and may repent. (7) May be saved in 
heaven or lost in hell. 

“And surely your blood of your lives will I require: at the 
HAND of every BEAST will I require it., and at the hand of man: at 
the hand of every man’s brother will I require the life of man. 
Whoso sheddeth man’s blood by man shall his blood be shed: for in 
the image of Go4 made He.man.”-—Gen. 9:5.6. 

This language God spoke to Noah at his exit from the ark. It 
is the law against murder. It reveals two different kinds of crea¬ 
tures; both have hands; it is possible for either to murder a man; 
both are intelligent subjects of the law, and liable to capital punish¬ 
ment. The one is called “beast;” the other is called “man.” The 
beast is not the “image of God,” but the man is. It could not have 
been a horse, or cow, or a lion, 0 r a bear thus enjoined against the 
murder of the “image of God." The law was given because MAN 
Is the IMAGE of GOD. Fourfooted beasts could not consider the 
Godlikeness in man, nor be held accountable for the destruction of 
the life of man. The “beast” must have been the representative of 
older, colored races. 

“And if a man lie with a beast, he shall surely be put to death: 
and ye shall slay the beast.” 

■ And if a woman approach unto any beast, and lie down there- 

(4) 


t<\. thou shalt kill the woman and the beast; they shall surely be put 
to death: their blood shall be upon them.”—Lev. 20:15,16. 

Hero again the “man” and the “beast” are equalized before the 
Jaw. Surely the beast here mentioned could not be a fourfooted 
beast. It must be a member of an inferior human vace. 

“These great beasts, which are four, are four kings.” “And he 
(the eleventh beast king) shall speak great words against the Most 
Hierh.”— Dan. 7:17-25. 

Undoubtedly these “beasts” are Turanian monarchy, who have 
never been favorable either to Judaism nor to Christianity. ^ 

“Let neither man nor beast, herd nor flock, taste any thing: let 
them not feed nor drink water: but let MAN and BEAST be covered 
with sackcloth, and cry mightily unto God: yea. let them (the man 
and the beast) turn every one from his evil way and from the vio¬ 
lence that is in their HANDS.”—Jonah 3:7,8. 

We note in this case that the animals that comprise the “herds 
and flocks” were not to wear sackcloth, nor “cry mightily to God,” 
nor to cleanse their hoofs from violence, but only to be neglected of 
food and water, while MAN and BEAST were turning from their 
evil way, refraining their hands from violence, and crying mightily 
unto God. Here is a “beast,” somewhat similar to “man,” which 
duplicated all the man did in the course of repentance. The man 
and the beast wore garments alike; were equally guilty before God; 
were equally endowed with the gift of prayer, and were alike heard 
in mercy. Certainly this could not have been a fourfooted beast. 
It must have been a tribe of a colored race, endowed with intelli¬ 
gence, free will and conscience, and provided with human organs 
and members, and addicted to the habits and conduct of the white 
man; a being that sinned against light and knowledge, and that was 
subject to future rewards and punishments. 

“And I beheld, and I heard the voice of many angels round 
about the throne, and the beasts, and the elders.”—Rev. 5:11. 

“And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire 
and brimstone, where the BEAST and the false prophet are, and 
shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.”—Rev. 20:10. 

CONCLUSION 

The foregoing passages describe a “beast” that has hands, wears 
garments, converses in human language, blasphemes or worships 
God, and stands in the same relation to law civil and divine, as does 
the being called “man,” and destined to judgment and to future re¬ 
ward at the same bar of God, and yet this being i s not man. Hence 
I conclude:, 

(1) No being is called MAN, in th e Holy Scriptures, except 
those which are of Adamic blood. 

(2) No being is called woman in the Scriptures except a fe¬ 
male of Adam’s race. 


( 5 ) 


(3) The black and yellow peoples were created prior to the 
creation of i Adam, and to distinguish these races from the white 
race, they are known in the Scriptures as the "beast” races which 
were not created in the image of God, and therefore could not be¬ 
come the inspired oracles of God, nor be the "seed” of which Christ 
should be born, nor possess the ability for world "dominion” and ex— 
emplarship. 

(4) The "beast” in question sustains exactly the relation the 
colored races have always sustained to the white race as its compli— 
cators in crime, and its imitators in religion; and its description in 
the word of God is characteristic of the Negro in lustful crime and 
emotionalism in religion; and its career in monarchy and anti-Chris¬ 
tian politics a picture in prose of th e yellow peoples. 

(5) ,Between the colored races and the white race there is a nat¬ 
ural and essential difference, both in time of creation and in physi¬ 
cal structure; and this difference is manifested in the superiority of 
the white race in intellectual, moral and social capacity; in physical 
beauty, inventive genius, and in achievement in religion, in science 
and art, and in higher civilization generally. 

(6) The colored races did not spring from Adam, nor from 
his posterity, and therefore sustain neither likeness nor kinship to 
the white race. 

(7) There is neither law nor reason given in the Bible for the 
commingling of white and colored races: therefore church separation 
on account of race and color may be observed without violence to 
the spirit of Christianity. 

DIFFICULTIES OF RACE THEORIES 

I am not unmindful of the difficulties in the way of my BEAST 
RACE theories. The illogical theories that God created the Negro' 
race through his curse on Cain, or that the rac e sprang from Ham 
as a consequence of Noah's curse on Canaan, preoccupy the public 
mind. Yet, neither theory has any support in the Bible, nor in 
history, nor. sound reason . The white Egyptians of ancient history 
were the known descendants of Ham. The servitude pronounced- 
upon Canaan was to be rendered to the posterity of his two uncles, 
Shem and Japheth. (Gen. 9:21-27.) This "curse” was but the bab¬ 
bling of the father who had committed a far greater offense in “get¬ 
ting drunk” than had Ham, his son, in telling it. The curse could 
not have been authorized nor verified by God. The Bible simply 
mentions this passing incident as the one and only mistake in a good 
and useful life, and does not record it as the work of divine inspir¬ 
ation. nor vouch for its fulfillment. Furthermore, the curse was not 
directed against Ham, who "let the cat out of the wallet,” but 
against Canaan who had nothing to do with it. There is no evidence 
in the Bible or profane history that the curse was fulfilled in making 
Ham the primogenitor of the Negro race. Yet ignorance has ac- 

( 6 ) 



corded the Negro a white ancestry in Ham and the title of “Ham— 
ite.” a theory contrary to Scripture and to all science and history. 
The theory that the negyo sprang from Cain is, if possible, more ab¬ 
surd, The Bible does not describe the color of the “mark upon 
Cain,” nor on what part of the man it was placed. But the word 
■does state emphatically that “the Lord set a mark upon Gain lest 
any finding him should kill him.” (Gen. 4:9-15. Who will undertake 
to prove that the black skin, kinky hair, or any mark has proved a 
protection to the Negro against violence? But if either or both 
theories were true it would only prove that the negro was a creature 
of God’s wrath, and nothing in favor of racial equality Both 
theories are contrary to the Scriptures, to the law of “like beget 
like” in the natural course of reproduction, and to all observation. 

My other difficulty lies in the frequent applicaation of the term 
“beast” to fourfooted animals, and to persons of debauched or 
vicious character. But I have carefully discriminated between such 
passages and those which describe a human being and at the sane 
timp call that being by the name “beast.” Such passages have their 
significance and every child of God owes the same due consider¬ 
ation. Their object must be found in the colored races: for no other 
object, fills their description. 

BEAST RACE THEORY AT ADVANTAGE 
The BEAST RACE THEORY holds a decided advantage over 
the theories that the Negro race sprang from Cain or Ham: (1) -Be¬ 
cause it accounts for the origin of the yellow race as well as the 
black, while the two old theories do not. (2) Because it is in har¬ 
mony with the God-given law that every living creature, of whatever 
order, should have “his female,” and reproduce after his kind, while 
the old theories are not. (3) Because it shows that the black and 
yellow races are of neither kin nor likeness to the white race physi¬ 
cally of psychically, and exactly describes the inferiority of the 
colored races, and this inferiority is verified by the backwardness of 
these races in science, art and religion, in every age and country. 
(4) Because it lays the basis for correct conclusions respecting 
Adam’s failure to find a “help meet” among the “beasts of the 
field;” (Gen. 2:20) and the mortal “serpent” that beguiled Eve; 
(Gen. 3:1-13,14) and Cain’s sin of going “after strange flesh,” 
which culminated in the murder of Abel; (Gen. 4:5-8) and solves 
the mystery of Cain’s wife. 

MISSION OF THE WHITE RACE 
God created the white race for a two-fold mission. The ac¬ 
complishment of that great essential mission required a race in 
God’s own likeness. That mission included (1) The incarnation of 
the Godhead in the “Son of Man,” the “Saviour of all men.” who 
should be of the “seed of the woman” Eve of th e “seed of Abra¬ 
ham,” and of the pure white stock of Adam. (Luke 3:23-28.) The 
(7) 



Godhead could not be associated with a race that did not bear the 
insignia of the likeness of God. Christ could not be born of a black 
or yellow female. The “precious blood” that, “cleanseth from all 
sin” could not be drawn from the veins of a Mongolian or a Negro. 
It must flow from the veins of a member of pure white stock of 
Adam and Eve. Hence it was necessary to safeguard the purify 
and integrity of the white blood through the call of Abraham and 
the law of circumcision. No inspired prophet was chosen from any 
colored race, nor a line of the Bible written except by members of 
Adam’s race of pure white stock. Hence the plan of redemption 
was ordained in the hands of the white race, and through that race 
alone could Christianity be established and perpetuated. It is the 
only race that is the living image of-God on earth; the only Mission¬ 
ary Race, and upon it the colored races must depend for evangeliza¬ 
tion . 

(2) The civil mission includes the works of science and art 
and higher civilization, and through these achievements the exercise 
of universal DOMINION as the Superior Race. In neither the 
Spiritual Mission nor the Civil Mission assigned to the white man 
could any colored race take the initiative. By nature they were 
unequal to these achievements. God gave the colored races neither 
the ability nor the duty of these sublime accomplishments, and con¬ 
sequently the older races have never moved a finger, a tongue nor a 
nen f nr the uplift of the white race, spiritually, morally, intellect¬ 
ually or socially. 

WHITE MAN’S COMMISSION 

The Great Commission was given to Adam and his posterity, in 
a progression of commandments, as follows: 

“So God created man in his own image, in the image of God 
create he him; male and female created he them. And God blessed 
them, and God said unto them, B e fruitful, and multiply, and re¬ 
plenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of 
the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living- thing 
that moveth upon the earth.” (Gen. 1:27,28) 

“What is man, that thou art mindful of him? Or the Son of 
Man that thou visitest him? Thou madest him a little lower than 
the angels; thou crownedest him him with glory and honor and didst 
set him over the works of thy hands: Thou hast put all things in sub., 
jection under his feet. For in that he pat all in subjection under 
him, he left nothing that is not put under him.” (Heb. 2:6-8) 

“And Jesus came, and spake unto them, saying, all power is 
given unto me in Heaven and in earth.” “Go y e therefore and teach 
all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the 
Son, and of the Holy Ghost: teaching them to observe all things 
whatsoever I have commanded you: and lo, I am with you alway, 
even unto the end of the world.” (Matt. 28:18-20) 

( 8 ) 


Who will undertake to prove that one line or word of this com ¬ 
mission was given to the black race, dr to the yellow race, or any 
other than Adam and his direct descendants? Or who will deny 
that this great commission rests upon the white race for its ultimate 
consummation. 

WHY THE TERM “BEAST” APPLIED TO RACES 

There is not a single case in the Bible wherein the term man or 
woman is applied to a member of a colored race. Their females were 
designated by the term “wench/'. (2 Sam. 17:17) but usually 
they were without regard to sex. known as “beasts of the earth” or 
“beasts of the field,” or “the beast,” from the days of Adam to 
Noah, and in later years they were called gentiles. (Gen. 2:20; Gen. 
3:1.) When the posterity of Noah had multiplied into strong fami¬ 
lies rr tribe«. they divided between themselves the “isles of the Gen¬ 
tiles,” which were preoccupied by the races which had now come to 
be known as gentiles. (Gen. 10:1-5.) Were these “Gentiles” not the 
descendants of the “beast” that had “hands,” and which received 
the law against murder, as mentioned in Gen. 9:5? These “Gen¬ 
tiles” spoke in a different “tongue” from the tribes of Noah (Gen. 
10:5) while at the time of the “land division,” which was prior to 
the building of the “tower,” the descendants of Noah all spoke, “one 
language.” (Gen. 11:1-6.) It is a known fact that the descendants 
of Noah did pot break up into separate nations until the “confusion 
of tongues” at Babel. Up to this time the descendants of Noah 
were one people and of one language, with their capitol on the plain 
of Shinar. (Gen. 11:1-6.) According to the chronological dates of 
the Bible, this “oneness” of tribal organization and speech, which 
included the entire posterity of Noah, continued from the exit from 
the ark, to the “confusion” at Babel, B.C. 2247, a period of one 
. century, while a year earlier, B. C. 2248, the “Gentiles” were in¬ 
habiting the “ lands” of the “isles.” and were divided into different 
nations and speaking different tongues.” I here give the statement 
“New these are the generations of the sons of Noah; Shem, Ham a nd 
Japheth, and unto them were sons born after the flood.” By these 
were the isles of the Gentiles divided in their lands; every one after 
his tongue, after their families', in their nations.” (Gen. 10:1-5.) 
These “isles” were inhabited by the “Gentiles” when these descend¬ 
ants of Noah extended their possessions over this territory. The 
Gentiles were divided into nations of different tongues, due, no 
doubt, to race-differentiation, the inhabitants being of colored tribes. 

ORIGIN OF THE TERM “GENTILE” 

It is an error, generally held, that the term, “gentile,” was 
originated after the kiw of circumcision was given, to distinguish 
the uncircumcised from those who had received the “sign of cir¬ 
cumcision.” Abraham received the covenant of circumcisin B. G. 
1398, (Gen. 17:10.) The inhabitants of the “isles” were called 

( 9 ) 


“Gentiles” as early as B. C. 2248, three hundred and fifty yeats 
before circumcision was instituted. The term must have been 
used originally to distinguish peoples in regard to race and color; 
and after the white race became the “elect race” through the call of 
Abraham, and separated from the colored races by the law of cir¬ 
cumcision, it was thereafter applied to white and colored races alike 
which wore not in their flesh, this covenant of race separation. By 
the time of Christ, the Jews as the elect race, had adopted the term 
“dog” to designate the uncircumcised. (Matt. 15:21-27; Mark 7:24- 
28.) The terms BEAST, GENTILE and DOG, have been used to 
distinguish the colored races from th e one MISSIONARY RACE, 
the only race that bears the “image of God;” the only race of which 
Christ could be born; and through which the purposes of God in 
grace, and in higher enlightenment and civilization could be accom¬ 
plished; the only race that could be a light to the Gentiles.” It was 
appropriate that the same terms should be applied to white persons 
and nations which refused to hear the call of God and conform to 
the WHITE RACE STANDARD, set by order of God, through the 
law of circumcision, which had as its object, territorial segregation 
of the white race from all colored races. White persons who re¬ 
fused to accept the law of circumcision were regarded, by the 
orthodox Jews, as favoring racial equality and the intermarriage of 
the white race with the beast races, and designated such persons or 
nations by the identical terms used to express the inferiority of the 
colored races. The terms BEAST. DOG, WENCH, and GENTILE 
are names used to express the inferiority of colored races, and to 
designate that absence of the divine image in such races, and their 
incapacity for divine inspiration and leadership in the world's prog¬ 
ress. and to elevate in the white race a high sense of its superiority, 
and a keen conviction of its high mission of universal dominion” 

The backwardness of the colored races has illustrated the wis¬ 
dom and the prophecy of divine inspiration in this choice of terms, 
to express their inferiority as compared with the white race. 

WORLD WITHOUT THE WHITE RACE 

We get a clearer conception still of the propriety and important 
significance of the term “beast,” etc., employed by inspiration to 
express the inferiority of the colored races, by considering the 
progress and achievements of the white race, and what the world 
would have been in all past ages, and would be today, without this 
one race “in the image of God.” Except for the white race, the 
namp of the true God would be unknown; not a line of the Bible, 
not a Christian church nor Jewish synagogue would greet the eye of 
the black—what? nor yellow—what? nor brown 0 r mongrel—what? 
By what name should a race thus incapacitated by nature to ap¬ 
proach the Supreme Creator, and receive and publish revelations 
from, him be called? Not only would the colored races be i n the ; r 

( 10 ) 


original night of heathen blindness, but without a system of learn¬ 
ing, without the arts of civilization, with no dwelling but the caves 
-of t.hp earth, the dug-out, or the hut of sticks and clay. What dif¬ 
ference would there be between such a tribe intellectually, morally, 
socially, or spiritually and the domestic beasts it rides, or the wild 
beasts that feasts upon its flesh And is it “strange’’ that the wis¬ 
dom of God designated the natural incapacity of such races by the 
term “beast?” Or that His Goodness created a race “in His own 
likeness” to “be a light unto these Gentiles?” 

Every passage I have cited in the word of God, that describes 
a being in human form, and enacting the deeds of men. good and 
evil; and as equal to men in responsibility and immortality; and 
which draws the contrast between these different kinds of creature 
by calling the one kind “man” and the other “beast,” is written in 
positive, unfigurative language. Since the man is not a figurative 
man representing something else, neither can the beast be a figur¬ 
ative beast representing something else. Hence I conclude that the 
colored races are beasts physically, as compared to man, and human 
beings as compared to fourfooted beasts. Past history in all coun¬ 
tries and ages confirms this appropriate title of the colored races, 
and verifies the contrast thus drawn between the races at their 
creation by the inspiration of God; and had inspiration not applied 
this title to the colored races, the world’s history and modern 
science would suggest it, 

A DIFFERENCE OF FLESH 

“All flesh is not the same flesh; but there is one kind of flesh of 
men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds. 
(I. Cor. 15:39.) 

Since the colored races are called beasts, it is certain the flesh 
of the Mongolian, or of the Negro, cannot be same in kind as that 
of the Caucasian Here is the natural basis of the difference be¬ 
tween the white race and the colored races, and this difference is 
stamped with a difference of physical form and color. The flesh of 
the Caucasian is white, and odorless, and of finer structure than that 
of the African of the Turanian. The grey matter of the brain is 
greater in quantity, finer in structure, and of a lighter color, in 
every way indicating higher intelligence, constituting a psychic as 
well as a physical difference. The form of the white man is more 
elegant and dignified, the features more beautiful, and the counte¬ 
nance more majestic, upon the whole exhibiting a far superior kind 
of flesh to that of the colored races. So great is the difference be- 
ween the Caucasian and the colored races that neither the body, 
■color, parts or members are alike. While the different races ar£ 
similar to each other physically, they are by no means alike. They 
are distinctly different kinds of flesh, created in different periods of 
the Sixth Age of Creation. 

(U) 


IMAGE OF GOD DEFINED 

This topic requires a passing notice of the mode of God’s ex¬ 
istence . Ail Christendom is agreed that God is a Trinity, known as 
the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit. These three are one 
God, who possesses as life properties, seven divine attributes, known 
in the Scriptures as the Seven Spirits of God, through which he is 
ubiquitous. (Rev. 4:5; Rev. 5:6; Ps. 139:7-10.) The attributes of 
God are (1) Wisdom. (2) Power. (3) Light or Communicability. (4) 
Ubiquity. (5) Mercy. (6) Justice. (7) Love. Though local in be¬ 
ing and separate from all things else, inhabiting eternity, and seated 
upon His throne in Heaven, through his divine attributes He sees 
and comprehends all things in all immensity, and is everywhere 
present to bless and succor the righteous, and to mark iniquity 
against the wicked. 

TRICHOTOMOUS ORDER OF MAN 

Secular science treats man as a dual being, the physical man, 
and the mental man. Divine inspiration looks deeper into the 
creature “in the image of God,” and treats him as a triune being of 
BODY, and of SPIRIT, and of SOUL. I see no reason why any 
Christian minister should undertake to identify the spirit and soul of 
man as the “one same thing,” as many do, or to use the Greek 
words NUMA—spirit, and SURE—soul, as perfect synonims. The 
two words are primarily different in meaning. The Scriptures mark 
the same difference between the spirit and soul as between the soul 
and the body, and declare the possibility of the separation of the 
soul from the spirit of man. The following passages could mean 
nothing else. 

“And I pray God your whole spirit, and soul, and body be pre¬ 
served blameless unto the coming of our Lord.” (I. Thes. 5:23.) 
“For the word of God is quick and powerful, and sharper than any 
two-edged sword, piercing even to the dividing^ asunder of soul and 
spirit. ” 

This description of the trichotomous order of man’s being, 
showing the organic relation of the body, soul, and spirit, comports 
exactly with the order in which Adam was created. First the body 
was formed of the earth; next the “spirit was formed within him.” 
(Zech. 12:1.) 0 f the ‘^breath of God;” from this union of spirit with 
a material substance, a third element, that part of man which feels, 
thinks, wills, and experiences pleasure or pain, the SOUL, was 
created, and a mysterious life “in the likeness of God” stood before 
his maker. 

“And the Lord God formed man 0 f the dust of the ground, and 
breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and man became a liv¬ 
ing soul.” (Gen. 2:7.) 

In the foregoing passages the triune order of mar is clearly 

( 12 ) 


portrayed as (1) The PHYSICAL man. (2) The SPIRITUAL man. 
(3) The MENTAL man. Thus man, in natural life state, is a living 
likeness of the Holy Trinity, a life picture of God. And as the Son 
of God, the Second Person of the Godhead, could lie dead in the 
tomb while his Divinity lived and reigned upon the throne in Heav¬ 
en, so the “spirits of just men made perfect” do live and rest in 
Heaven while their dead bodies sleep in unpathetic dust. 

AHAMIC FLESH THE FILM 

The film or fabric upon which the like properties of the being 
of man and the being of God are inwrought is the ADAMIC BODY 
OF FLESH. It could be wrought in no other kind of flesh. When 
God formed Adam He “prepared a body” for the “indwelling of the 
Godhead bodily.” (Heb. 10:5; Col. 2:9.) No other than an Adamic 
body of flesh could be sanctified by an organic life relation with the 
Godhead, endued with omnipotence, and at last made the supreme 
sacrifice for the sins of the world. The redeeming blood could only 
be drawn from the mortal veins of the dying image of God. That 
image could be found alone in a member of Adam’s race, the seed 
of the woman Eve, a true, unadulterated son of Adam. (Luke 3:38.) 
“And so it is written. The first man Adam was made a living soul, 
the last Adam (Christ) was made a quicken Spirit.” (I. Cor. 15:45.) 

The first Adam was formed of the earth. The last Adam was 
formed of the life substance of the Virgin Mary, who was of the 
“seed of the woman” Eve, which was formed of the flesh and bone 
of Adam. (Gen. 2:21-23.) Jesus Christ was the direct descent of 
Adam and Eve, of the purest type of the white race, and therefore 
the “EXPRESS IMAGE of God.” (Heb. 1:1-3.) In hi s humanity 
Jesus was truly the “Son of Man;” in his divinity, the “Son of 
God,” in whom the Godlikeness of man is expressed. Hence I con¬ 
clude that outside of the white race, the seed of Adam and Eve, 
there is no image of God on earth. 

CHRIST THE PATTERN 

When God said, “Let .us make man in our own image, after onr 
likeness,” (Gen. 1:26) the birth and redemption work of Jesus was 
contemplated. Thus Christ stood as “the Lamb slain from the 
foundation of the world.” (Rev. 13:8) Thus Jesus, foreseen and 
foreordained as the incarnate God in the “form of sinful man,” was 
the pattern after which Adam was fashioned when God formed him 
of the dust of the earth. Jesus, as God manifest in flesh, was the 
sublime being of which Adam was made the image and the likeness . 

ONE PATTERN AND ONE LIKENESS 

When God said, “Let us make man in our own image, after our 
was created, and that being was Adam. The beast that has hands, 
wears garments, converses in human language, and plays his part in 
human words and deeds in things right and things wrong (generally 

(13) 


wrong) had been created, with his species, when God saw that 
“there was not a man to till the ground/' (Gen. 2:5.) and therefore 
no being “in the likeness of God." It was then ordained that 
Christ should be “made of a woman, made under the law" of cir¬ 
cumcision; (Gal. 4:4.) made a true “Son of Man, with a body of 
Adamic flesh, with a spirit and soul, a very Adam in his humanity. 
As “there is but one God the Father of all," and but one Jesus 
Christ, there is but one race in His image, the race whose primogen¬ 
itor was created in His likeness. 

STANDARDIZATION IN CREATION 
In the whole course of creation, vegetable and animal, every 
separate order was to have “its seed in itself," and produce “after 
its kind." Every order of creation was standardized. (Gen 1:11-25) 
Every male was to have his own female, that he might re¬ 
produce after his kind; that his offspring should appear in his own 
likeness, that each different form of life, animate and inanimate, 
might hold its place and serve its purpose as God designed in its 
creation . This natural law of standardization became statutory 
law in the code of Palestine by the proclamation of the lawgiver 
Moses. “Thou shalt not let thy cattle gender with a diverse kind: 
thou shalt not sow thy field with mingled seed." (Lev. 19:19.) The 
modern Science of Agriculture emphasizes the wisdom and benefit 
of this natural and the statutory law of standardization. 

RACES STANDARDIZED 

When God created Adam he gave him the name MAN, the term 
signifying the “image of God." He left it to Adam to give names 
to other creatures. Eve had not been formed when Adam gave 
each kind of creature its proper name. According to the order in 
which Adam performed this task, he named the cattle, all domestic 
animals first, with no thought of choosing a female for himself. He 
next applied names to winged tribes, still with no “thoughts of 
matrimony distracting his brain." Bvt when he came to “give 
names to every beast of the field," the Negro and his species with 
brown and yellow skin, thoughts of marriage at once perplexed him „ 
Of course his marriage with a black or yellow female was a physical 
possibility, but wholly improper. It was then that he keenly real¬ 
ized that as “for Adam there was not found a help meet for him." 
(Gen. 2:20.) 

A SUBLIME EXAMPLE 

. .It was not divinely intended that Adam should choose a wife of 
any species of the older colored races, but that a sublime example of 
racial integrity should be set for all subsequent generations. Though 
without a female of his own kind and an open opportunity to wed 
and begin life with a burly Negress, or a dwarfed female of tawny 
skin, he chose to live alone, and let his race fail of existence rather 

(14) 


than produce a mongrel race with form and features unlike his own , 
The black or yellow female could be a “help” to him physically, but 
were not “meet,” not worthy morally, nor suitable intellectually. 
They were to him but “beasts of the field.” They were of a differ¬ 
ent kind of flesh from that of his own. In this extremity he set 
a world example for the separation of races. Just as Adam, inspir¬ 
ed with an exalted sense of his infinite superiority to the rough hu ¬ 
man forms about him which he prophetically called “beasts of the 
held,” had come to keenly feel his need of a female of his own kind; 
and by refusing a female of “strange flesh . . had set a world ex¬ 
ample for race integrity, it was then that God created for him a fe- 
emale pf his own blood, flesh and bone, that the race in God’s image, 
the only race of which Messiah could be born, should be multiplied 
and perpetuated on the earth. (Gen. 1:26-28.) 

LAW OF RACE UNITY IN MARRIAGE 

When Adani received his female from the hand of God, he 
briefly commented on her physiognomy, “This is now bone of my 
bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called woman, because she 
was taken out of man.” (Gen. 2:23.) To this comment God replied 
with the universal, eternal, unchangeable law of RACE UNITY IN 
MARRIAGE, in the following plain language: 

“Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and 
shall CLEAVE unto his WIFE: and they shall be ONE FLESH.” 
(Gen. 2:24.) 

Jesus Christ confirmed this law. (Matt. 19:5; I. Cor. 6:16.) 

By adhering to this law the close relations that existed between 
Adam and Eve, and the race idenitiy that made them “one flesh’* 
could be maintained indefinitely, and race amalgamation prevented, 
and the living image of God perpetuated on the earth through race 
unity in marriage . In no other sense were Adam and Eve “one 
except in kind of flesh. They were one racially. No person and 
his wife are “one” when the two are of different races, but are dis¬ 
tinctly two in every sense, and notwithstanding the sanction of 
human law, they are adulterers in the eyes of God, and condemned 
by this LAW of RACE UNITY IN MARRIAGE. 

AMERICAN INDIANS AN EXCEPTION 

Against the theory that the “American Indian was cut off from 
the other Abrahamic tribes by the great earthquake that forged 
the bed of the Atlantic ocean and that they are the lost tribes of 
Israel,” I enter no protest. Their identity with the Shematic white 
race seems to be attested in the following facts. (1) When discover¬ 
ed by white Europeans, they were not pagans, but worshiped “The 
Great Spirit,” as the “Supreme Creator and Father.” (2) They, in 
some tribes, maintained monogomy in marriage and the family 
compact. (3) When Christianized and educated they measure up 

(15) 


to the standard of the white man intellectually, morally and social¬ 
ly. (4) The tawny complexion, caused by centuries of life m open 
air and sunshine, under modern indoor business and civilized home, 
life is giving place to the white visage of the Caucasian. (5) By 
test the Indian seems to be assimilable to the white race through in¬ 
termarriage, and upon the whole, a pure tribe of the white race, of 
the Semetic stock. On this account, I have thought it proper to ad¬ 
mit the Indian, as well as the Jew, to membership in the True Amer¬ 
ican League of theWhite Brotherhood of Man; but those of African 
or Turanian descent, who are taken in the United States census as 
such, are debarred. 

TERRITORIAL SEPARATION OF RACES 

Nothing is more plainly revealed in the Bible than the Law of 
Race Unity In Marriage, and the Law of the Territorial Segregation 
of Races for the prevention of race amalgamation. Yet no law of 
God is more universally overlooked and violated; and from no sin is 
there a greater flood of corruption, violence and crime turned loose 
upon the world. That the churches and preachers should be silent 
upon these plain laws of God and the universal corruption that rises 
from their violation, is one of the world’s greatest wonders. The in¬ 
spiration of the prophets; the gift of the Bible; the birth of Jesus 
Christ; the founding and spread of Christianity and higher civiliza¬ 
tion were all objects of these provisions of God for the perpetuity of 
the white race in its Adamic purity. These essential purposes of 
God in grace could be accomplished in no other race, nor in a mon¬ 
grel breed. And as we shall notice on following pages sin, with all 
its train of sorrow, shame, misery and death, entered the world 
through violation of these provisions of God. The vulgar sin of the 
social equality of races was the first step toward degredation, taken 
by the great race in the image of God, which resulted in the “fall of 
man.” The same sin has repeatedly brought disaster to all races, and 
envelopes America today with a cloud of political and social dark¬ 
ness that forebodes national disaster, and engenders its citizens with 
division and strife, not sparing the churches. 

EXAMPLES OF RACE SEGREGATION 

(1) When God had “joined together” our first white parents 
under the law of race unity in marriage, He did not leave them on 
the territory of the “beast” races. He placed them in the Garden, 
in the eastern part of Eden, and commanded them to cultivate and 
keep this tract. ' Here is God’s first provision for the territorial 
segregation -of races. 

SERPENT THAT BEGUILED EVE 

' 

“Serpent” is a term applied to the evil spirit, even when he is 
incarnate in human flesh. The evil spirit, disembodied, is called 
“the devil,” or the “wicked one,” etc. But in cases wherein he be- 

( 16 ) 


comes incarnate in any human being that person is called a ‘‘devil,” 
(John 6:70,71. or a “serpent.” Matt. 23:33.) Through the lips of 
such persons the will of the Evil Spirit finds expression in human 
speech. (Matt. 8:28 81; Mark 5:1-10; Luke 8:26-30.) Such was 
the serpent that beguiled Eve. She deceived her by false argument 
against the truth and integrity of God, and this argument she waged 
in articulate language. This serpent was undoubtedly a female of 
an inferior human race, a member of the “beasts of the field”’ 
among whom was not found a “help meet” for Adam. The evil spir¬ 
it had vitiated this beast race previously, and chose this female as. 
his agent in extending corruption to, the white race. The language 
of this sad story upholds this view. “Now the serpent was more sub¬ 
tle than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made: and he 
said unto the woman, etc.” (Gen. 3:1.) 

Here the serpent, or evil spirit, is represented as in contact 
with he “beast of the field,” and as proving more “subtle,, than the 
beast.” That this “beast of the field,'”* who had fallen a victim to 
the “wiles of the devil,” was a female mortal, which required mater¬ 
ial food, and whose “days of life” were limited to mortality, is 
clearly implied in the language God used in pronouncing judgment 
upon this female mortal serpent, who was to be the primordial 
mother of an evil “seed” that should “bruise the heel” of the “seed” 
of;Eve. “And the Lord said unto the serpent, because thou hast 
. done this (Beguiled Eve) thou art cursed above all cattle, and above 
every beast of the field: upon thy belly Shalt thou go, and dust shalt 
thou eat all the days of thy life: and I will put enmity between thee 
and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed: it shall bruise 
thy head, and thou shalt bruise .his heel.” (Read Gen. 3:1-5.) - 

Analysis of these passages shows (1) That the female who be¬ 
guiled Eve through false language, was a “serpent” in the same 
sense that the wicked Pharisees were serpents; in the same sense 
that Judas was a “devil.” (2) That this “serpent” was a mortal be¬ 
ing who was to suffer humiliation for her deception all the days of 
her life. (3) That she was to be the primordial mother of a “seed” 
or race, as Eve was to be the primordial mother of a different 
“seed” or race; and that “enmity” should exist between these differ¬ 
ent races. (4) That the seed of the serpent should bruise “the 
heel,” that is hinder the progress and injure the interests of the seed 
or posterity of Eve. (5) That through the seed of Eve the “head” 
of the serpent should be “bruised,” that is his power should be final¬ 
ly broken through the Messiahship of Jesus. 

The prophecy of this language of God in pronouncing judgment 
upon original sin has been fulfilled to the letter. The colored races 
have “bruised the heel” of the white race at every step of its prog¬ 
ress. In contact with the white man, whether as slaves or as citi¬ 
zens, these “beasts of the field,, have proved enemies to bis best 

(17) 


interests, and never uplifting. On the other hand, when Jesus was 
born, he came as the “seed of the woman/’ and a pure son of Adam; 
observing the law of circumcision the true sign and vow of race 
segregation, and confined his ministry to that “remnant of Adam s 
race which wore the sublime seal of circumcision, the “lost sheep of 
the house of Israel.” 

By admitting this “serpent” to her premises as her social equal 
and teacher, Eve opened the way for that deception and temptation 
which resulted in the fall of the white family, and its expulsion from 
the Garden. The provision for the territorial separation of the 
races was thus broken down by violation of God’s law. Only the- 
Law of Race Unity In Marriage remained intact for the safeguard 
of the image of God, and this open to violation. So completely was 
this female that wrought this great calamity SATANIFIED that she 
is treated as the masculine gender, and truly “he” it was that spoke 
in this “beast of the field.” 

CAIN’S SIN 

With this view of the beast races it is not difficult to determine 
the character of Cain’s sin that so vitiated his sacrifice as to render 
it unacceptable. “And the Lord had respect unto Abel, and to his 
offering: but unto Cain, and to his offering, he had not respect: and 
Cain was very wroth, and his countenance fell.” “And the Lord 
said unto Cain, Why art thou wroth? and why is thy countenance 
fallen? and if thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if 
thou dost not well sin lieth at the door: and unto thee shall be his 
desire- and thou shalt rule over him.” (Gen. 4:4-7.i 

Here is another mortal female so completely under the influence 
of the devil, so imbued with hi s spirit, that she is accorded his SEX 
by the pronouns “his” and “him.” (Verse 7) Cain was enamored 
with a female of “strange flesh.” This was the sin that “lay at his. 
door,” which vitiated his sacrifice, and which culminated in the 
murder of his brother Abel. Jud e clearly defines the first sin that 
lay at Cain’s door to be “fornication” with “strange flesh.” In speak¬ 
ing of the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah who followed Cain’s 
example, Jude says: “Even as Sodom and Gomorrah, and th e cities 
about them in like manner giving themselves over to fornication, 
and GOING AFTER STRANGE FLESH, are set forth for an exam¬ 
ple, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire. Likewise also these 
filthy dreamers defile the flesh.” (Jude, verses 7,8.) Of these filthy 
fornicators that affiliated with strange flesh, Jude further declares, 
“Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain.” (V. ll.) 

CAIN’S WIFE 

Jude relieves Cain’s wife of all mystery in which the antiquated 
theory of one human race at the close of the great age of. creation, 
and the subsequent creation of the Negro rac e “through Cain or 
Ham, has involved her. She was a Negress, not of Adamic-Evic 

(18) 




stock, but of a “strange flesh,, to that of Cain. Cain was a misce— 
genist, a pure white man who intermarried with a full blood Neg¬ 
ress. His first sin of miscegenation was the violation of the God- 
given law of RACE UNITY IN MARRIAGE, (Gen. 2:24) which re¬ 
quires the husband and wife shall be of “one flesh" racially, that the 
standard of white race purity should be maintained. Cain and his 
wife were not of one flesh. 

CAIN’S POSTERITY 

Gen. 4:16-24, gives a brief but comprehensive history of Cain’s 
mulatto tribe, according to the marginal dates of the Bible, covering 
a period of 1,200 years. A worse history is not found in the annals 
of nations. (1) During this long period the name of God is not 
mentioned in connection with this mongrel tribe, nor an inspired 
prophet produced. (2) No system of religion was maintained, nor 
a godly character mentioned. (3) Murder and polygamy character¬ 
ized this mongrel tribe. (Verses 19-24) (4) Cain and his tribe wer e 
excluded from the genealogy of Christ, and the line given through 
Seth, the third son of Adam. (Luke 3:38.) (5) His entire generation 
of mongrels was annihilated by the deluge, and the white race again 
unified in Noah, a direct descendant of Adam through Seth, because 
only Noah, who walked with God, was found to be “perfect in his 
generations." (Gen. 6:7-9.) 

Cain, as a miscegenist and fratracidist, was driven by the ven¬ 
geance of God from the territory occupied by his parents, and with 
his wife of “strange flesh," migrated to the land of Nod, and there 
founded - Q - great mongrel nation of licentious degenerates. 

SETH’S TRIBE 

After the death of Abel, Adam’s third son, Seth, was born. Eve 
as a true prophetess, at the birth of Seth declared, “God hath ap¬ 
pointed me another seed instead of Abel." It was in the days of 
Seth than “men began to call upon the Lord," or as the marginal 
rendering puts it, “to call themselves by the name of the Lord." 
Gen. 4:25,26. Gen. 6:2.( The Fifth chapter of Genesis gives a his¬ 
tory of Seth’s tribe, beginning with the creation of Adam, a separ¬ 
ate account of Adam’s race, excluding Cain, who, for the crime of 
miscegenation, God had excluded from the Adamic race. The history 
of Seth and his posterity is thus segregated from the history of Cain 
and his mongrel tribe. This was God’s second provision for the 
TERRITORIAL SEGREGATION 0 f RACES, the BANISHMENT of 
the MISCEGENISTS from territory occupied by the white race. 
This provided latitude for the propagation of a powerful tribe of 
pure Adamic stock. 

GOLDEN AGE 

The tribe of Seth includes the white race from Adam to Noah, 
embracing a period of 1,000 years. Taking the Fifth chapter of 
Genesis for our data. we. have the following brilliant account of that 

(19) 


pure white tribe. r (l) During- that great period there is not a case 
of murder, polygamy, nor of any other crime charged to a member 
of this great white tribe. (2) The greatest longevity known to his¬ 
tory, sacred or profane, is accorded to this great people; Methuselah, 
the son r>f the great prophet Enoch, attaining to the age of 969 
years. (3) Enoch, the prophet who “walked with God,” and “Noah 
the preacher of righteousness” (II. Peter 2:5) were of this tribe. 
‘(4) As a whole people, they were pious, and were known to each 
other and recognized by the divine Scriptures as the children of God. 
(Gen: 4:26; Gen. 6:2.) 

Upon the whole, this great white tribe, segregated from all 
colored and mongrel races, produced a history unequalled in the an¬ 
nals of time by any people for long a period, in any other age or 
country. It should be known as THE GREAT GOLDEN AGE, to 
emphasize the moral, social, intellectual and spiritual benefits of the 
territorial segregation of races, and the race unity of nations. 

GOLDEN AGE ECLIPSED 

While the tribe of Seth was living in conformity to the laws of 
nature, and to the spoken laws of nature’s God, the mongrel tribe 
of Cain was reveling in wanton violations of both. After the lapse 
of centuries these two tribes extended their settlements as to join 
their hitherto separate territories. The two tribes became intermix¬ 
ed. It was then the Golden Age became eclipsed in the hideous 
cloud of race amalgamation and its invariable production of ignor¬ 
ance, violence and licentious crime, and the following story of uni- 
sersal regin of miscegenation and world disaster passed into sacred 
history. 


CAUSE OF DELUGE 

Our investigation of the origin and differentiation 0 f races now 
brings us to the Sixth chapter of Genesis. 

On previous pages I have declared Cain’s wife to b e , a Negress. 
I have shown that Seth’s tribe lived in conformity to God’s law of 
RACE UNITY in marriage and of RACE SEGREGATION, and that 
his posterity were known as “sons of God.” This sublime’ title was 
in no case applied to Cain’s tribe, was used to signify the likeness of 
God in this pure Adamic stock as the natural result of its “walk with 
God” on the “highway” of white race unity. I n the light of these 
(usually neglected and outlawed) truths, the following sacred his¬ 
tory is vefv instructive. 

, * And ’ t Cam ® to pass, when men began to multiply on the face 

of the earth, and daughters were born unto them, that the sons of 
God saw the daughters of menthat they were FAIR; and they took 
them wives of all whom they chose.” (Verses 12) 

(1) The multiplying of Cain’s and Seth’s tribes, brought the 
two tribes to commingle as neighbors. (2) The males of Seth’- 
tribe were known as “the sons of God,” and the females of Cain’s 

( 20 ) 


tribe were known as “the daughters of men.” 

(3) The complexion of these “daughters of men,, was neither 
white nor black, but of “fair,” or light mulatto color. 

(4) When the sons of God “saw that these daughters of men 
were fair,” they chose them as wives. 

Why the SERIOUS CONSIDERATION of the COLOR of these 
female descendants of Cain? And why did their “fair” color sug¬ 
gest the propriety of the intermarriage of these “sons of God” with 
these “daughters of men?” I answer, that the tribe of Seth under¬ 
stood and observed the law of race unity in marriage; understood 
that Cain had married a wife of “strange flesh,” a black female, in 
violation of God’s law but the “fair” features of his descendants in¬ 
dicated the Adamic strain was sufficiently pure to render their mar¬ 
riage with these daughters of men lawful and harmless. Thus the 
sons of God were deceived into amalgamation with Cain’s mulatto 
tribe, and the human family was once more “beguiled” by the same 
“old serpent,” Noah only excepted. This universal miscegenation 
was the CAUSE for which the deluge was sent upon the earth, a 
merciful provision to prevent the extermination of the only race of 
which Messiah could be born. 

CAIN’S TRIBE A BEAST RACE 

(1) To these sons of God and daughters of men were born 
“giants,” “men of renown” for athletic ability, which proves that 
Cain’s posterity was not amalgamated with Turanian or Mongolian 
stock. (See Verse 4.) 

(2) Verse 5> which reads, “And God saw that the wickedness 
of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the 
thoughts of his heart was only evil continually,” has the the follow¬ 
ing marginal rendering, “And God saw that th e imagination, pur¬ 
poses and desires of man on earth was from man unto beast.” 

This marginal translation of this verse is found in most copies 
of the King James Version with references, placed there by the best 
Bible scholarship of the world. The facts (1) That Cain’s wife was 
of “strange flesh:” (2) That his female descendants were neither 
white nor black, but only “fair,” 0 r light colored: (3) That the off¬ 
spring of the ‘‘sons of God” by these light colored females were of 
gigantic stature: (4) That the desire of th e “sons of God” toward 
these peculiar females was, according to the best translation of the 
passage, a desire “from man toward beast,” prove conclusively that 
Cain’s wife was a Negress, a member of the beast race, and his de¬ 
scendants were mulattoes; and though similar to men, and in a sec¬ 
ondary sense called “men,” they were in fact “beasts,” in a strict 
racial sense, and wholly unassimilable to Seth’s tribe. The result of 
these marriages was the universal “corruption” of the “flesh” of the 
white race, which lowered th e morals and vitiated the disposition of 
the entire nopulation. 


( 21 ) 


NOAH’S PERFECTION 

“Noah was a just man, and PERFECT in his GENERATIONS. 
^Verse 9.) His “perfection” was RACIAL PERFECTION, the per¬ 
fection of tribe or generation, the sequence of his “walk with God” 
in the laws of race unity in marriage and the total segregation of 
races. Except Noah, his wife, and three sons and their wives, the 
•whole world was mongrelized. 

MAN CORRUPTED RACIALLY 

The Caucasian blood was the dominant strain in the world’s 
^reat mass of mongrels, and to emphasize this larger degree of 
Adamic blood, and the absolute responsibility of the white man for 
this horrible condition, the term MAN was, for the first instance in 
the Bible, applied to this tribe of mongrel human beasts, but in quite 
a. different sense from that in which it was originally applied to the 
Being in God’s image. The murderer and bigamist Lamech falsely 
applied this sublime term to his mongrel tribe. It was not man in 
his pristine racial perfection, bearing the likeness of God, that the 
Creator determined to destroy by deluge, but corrupted man in 
whose veins coursed the blood of the beast races. (Verse 7.) The 
preservation of Noah and his family, who alone were “perfect in 
their generations” from Adam to Japheth, illustrates this important 
fact. Except this one white family, all human “flesh was corrupt,’ 1 ' 
and violence reigned supreme. (Verses 5-13) This condition was due 
to miscegenation as the CAUSE, and the CONDITION precipitated 
world disaster. Race amalgamation was the sole cause of the flood. 

OBJECT OF THE DELUGE 

Turn now to Luke 2:16, and the eyes of your faith will discover 
the OBJECT of the DELUGE. That object was a BABE, created 
of the virgin purity of a devout maiden, a tru e “seed” of Eve, the 
^‘Second Adam,” the “Express Image of God:” the promised “seed 
that should bruise the head of the Serpent.” (Gen. 3:15.) Of the 
corrupted seed of Adam, the mongrel breed of miscegenists, Christ 
vmnld never be born. He must be of the pure stock of Adam 
:and Eve . This was found alone in Noah and his family. A few 
.more generations and the white stock of Adam would be merged in ¬ 
to the beast blood of the colored races, and the white race destroyed 
from the earth, and the birth of Jesus, the supreme purpose of God 
in creating a race in his image, defeated . In the creation of Adam 
and his female; the law of race unity in marriage; and the law of 
territorial segregation of races, the birth and redemptive work of 
Christ, and higher civilization through Christianity was the supreme 
object. Universal extermination of mongrel breed was the only 
means by which one family 0 f only “eight souls” could be able to 
replenish the earth” with a pure white Adamic stock. This com¬ 
mand God did not lay upon Noah until he had removed the mixed 
Bloods out of the way of this one white family. (Gen. 9-1 ) 


deluge a mercy 


When God decreed the deluge, but one white family existed- 
’ih.e mongrel breed covered the earth. Their licentious crimes and! 
flerep violence rendered it more fearful to live than to die. For the 1 
future of this "generation of serpents” there was nothing but de— 
spair: no possibility of reformation. In the days of this universal' 
miscegenation and consequent desperate wickedness, the Spirit of* 
Christ inspired Noah to preach righteousness to this mongrel tribe* 
all during the days when the ark was in a course of construction,. 
Yet they repented not: for when the Spirit of God inspired Peter 
write of Noah’s preaching in the Spirit of Christ to the mongrel an- 
tedeluvians. he discovered that their “spirits” were confined in tha 
“orison” of hell, awaiting the great'judgment day. (I. Pet. 2 
It was in the light of this gospel, in mercy and the power of the 
Spirit of Christ’s Divinity preached, that God declared to Noah, “My 
Spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet 
his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.” (Gen. 6:3.) All 
during that one hundred and twenty years the “longsuffering of Go<f 
in mercy “waited” for the return of the world to the laws it had 
forsaken, while His Spirit, through the preached gospel of righteous¬ 
ness, strove with the mongrel breed, not a “beast” was saved front 
the deluge, nor from the “prison” of lost spirits. Though the Spirit. 
r.f Christ did this preaching through Noah while he was preparing 
the ark, Peter, by the same Spirit of inspiration, apprehended the 
spirits of these mongrel beasts still in hell’s gloomy prison more that* 
two thousand years later, and I presume they are waiting there still 
for the sounding of the trump of God to summon them, soul and 
body to judgment. I think all will agree that the extermination of 
this lost mongrel tribe was a mercy, lest it continue to throng the 
prison of lost spirits with future posterity, and by total miscegena¬ 
tion; leave the world without the white race, and consequently With¬ 
out a Christ and the blessings of Christianity; and wh'lo a mercy t» 
miscegenists, it was but plain justice to the one family which walked 
with God and maintained one “generation” of pure, white, Adamic 
stock, of which Christ was born two thousand years later, which 
greatest of all benefits was reduced to a last possibility, and that 
was universal extermination of the mongrel tribes. Praise. God for 
that last expedient, and just application of the same. Amen. 

Again I repeat, that flood was an act of both the mercy and ti»e 
justice of God in keeping the “Highway” open for the advent of 
Messiah and the establishment of the Kingdom of God among men, 
NEGRO IN THE ARK 

By the unscientific, and unscriptural doctrine of Monogenesis.,, 
claiming the yellow Turanian, the Black African, and the white 
Caucasian as the “monogeny” of Adam, the true facts of races dis¬ 
tinctly different, has, for centuries, been lost to the world. The de— 

(23) 



scription of a beast with hands, endowed with human speech and 
reason; .and subject to laws and penalties; and participating with 
Adam's race in the crimes of murder pvd fornication; and as capable 
of repentance toward God, and thecreation of this human ‘‘beast of 
the field” prior to the creation of Adam explodes the . theory of 
Monogenesis, and lays a new and Scriptural basis for the true 
sc ence of Ethnology, and solves the mystery of the preservation of 
the Negro and his species in the ark. The colored races, in full 
blood, passed into the ark under the title of ''beasts that are NOT 
CLEAN.” (Gen. 7:2. 8. 14.) These human “beasts” were “unclean” 
in the sense that they were unfit for sacrifice, either in type or ante- 
type. The “imcleanness” “of the colored races as unfit for divine 
inspiration, or as races from which Messiah could spring with a 
“body prepared' 5 for the supreme sacrifice for sin. was typified in 
the “uncleanness” of camels, horses and other fourfooted beasts, 
which were, by divine law, prohibited in religious sacrifice; while 
the cleanness of the white race, or its fitness for divine inspiration 
and of which Messiah should come, was typified by the sheep and 
the kine. The Messiah could not come of the Negro, nor any of his 
species. Hence the colored races are styled “beasts that are not 
clean.” With this view of the origin of the colored races', and the 
Scriptural titles applied to them adjectively, as “beast of the field.” 
denoting their adaptability to civilization under the example and 
tutelage of the white man, we can read the following law of God, 
given to the colored races and to the white man in the sublimity of 
its full and beneficent significance . 


“And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, be 
fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth. And the fear of 
you, and the dread of you, shall be upon EVERY BEAST of the 
EARTH, and upon every fowl of the air, upon all that moveth upon 
the earth and upon all the fishes of the sea: into your hands are they 
delivered. Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; 
even as the green herb have I given you all things But flesh with 
the life thereof which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat. And 

b T l0 ° d ° f y ° Ur Hves wiU 1 re ^ uire: at the HAND 0 f every 
BLASI will I require it, and at th e HAND of MAN ” (Gen 9 *1 5 ) 

As Noah and his family stepped forth from the ark, surrounded by 
the creatures which God had, through the dilligent obedience of the 

TrTxr^ PreS ! rVed fr ° m extermina tion, lo, there stood a BEAST 
with HAND ready, to slay the last REMNANT,, of the race in th« 

image of God. To this dangerous creature. God proclaimed in 

ofTan ” a Whv’ b‘ thS ha ,? d f b8aSt wiU 1 rec i uire the life 

f y an ' Why? Because he had made the man in his own image 

e°j IaV -L < b mimon over every other creature oyer all the earth’ 
and with tins creature alone could he commune; and through tht 
race he had chosen to reveal his lov e to the woVld.and wo^out a 

(24) 


plan of salvation for all races.” God did not say, “At the hand of 
every man will I require the life of the beast.” Why? Because the 
beast was not made in the image of God. Yet the beast was enjoin¬ 
ed to restrain his hand from violence to the white man. Certainly 
this peculiar beast survived the deluge in the ark, and must have 
entered the ark under the title of “beasts that are not clean.” These 
beasts could have been nothing else than the colored races. 

RAXES RE-STANDARDIZED 

Here I would again reiterate the eternal, unchangeable law of 
standardization observed by the Almighty God in creation, and by' 
him established as the natural law of reproduction in all life, vege¬ 
table an animal; and for the observance of this law, God holds the 
white man responsible . Hence He commanded race unity in mar¬ 
riage fcr the maintenance of a perfect standard of the race in his 
image: (Gen. 2:24) and the maintenance of this law of standardiza¬ 
tion in the production of live stock and farm products. (Lev. 19:19.) 
The flood was the means of universal extermination of mixed breeds 
for the reestablishment of a general system of standardization, that 
the law of “like beget like” should reign in all nature, that the pur¬ 
poses of God in creation should be accomplished. Each male was 
taken into the ark with his female, (Gen. 7:2, 3.) and after the 
flood, all creation was launched once more on its original basis of 
standardization, and the white race stood again, as at creation, with¬ 
out a species, with the original command to “be fruitful, and multi¬ 
ply, and replenish the earth,” and to exercise “dominion” over all 
other creatures. (Gen. 9:1, 2.) Noah now stood as Adam stood at 
creation. (Compare Gen. 1:27, 28, with verses above cited.) Such 
is the interest which, God takes in the purity of the white race, and 
such are his severe measures of rescuing his image from extermina¬ 
tion through the unnecessary, wanton crime of miscegenation. 

RACE WITHOUT SPECIES 

The white race was created without a species, as truly as the 
Divine Godhead is without species. As there is but one true God, 
his likeness could not be divided into species, and maintained in race 
differentiation. Therefore the infusion of colored race blood into 
Adamic stock produces an artificial species of the white race in 
which the image of God is lacking. Such mongrel offspring are but 
products of God’s violated law, and are accounted their standing and 
destiny, as human beings, with the beast races. In every age and 
dispensation, the wisdom and justice of God has held miscegenation 
as a crime worthy of death. 

RACE AMALGAMATION RENEWED 

The Tenth and Eleventh chapters of Genesis give a summarized 
account of the increase of the family of Noah, and its division into 
different languages at Babel; and its subsequent division into na- 

(25) 


tions. (With these two chapters should be studied Myers' General 
History, pages 1-7, and the science of Ethnology.) The Scriptural 
history of the great white family given in these two chapters covers 
.a period of about 325 years, from the flood to the call of Abraham. 
(Gen. 12:1.) 

It is too well known, in scholarly circles, that Egypt was settled 
by the descendants of Ham, who were of pure white stock, to need 
argument. The earlier history of Egypt reveals it as the most en¬ 
lightened and powerful of ancient nations. Its supremacy among 
the nations continued for many centuries. It was before the im¬ 
perial court of the Hamites that Moses and Aaron performed their 
great miracles. 

NEGRO SLAVERY INTRODUCED 


Upon the monuments of Thebes, are sculptures of Negroes, 
‘chained together, ready for the auction block, showing the institu¬ 
tion of the black slave trade to have existed among the Hamites 
from the founding of the Egyptian nation. First negro slavery; 
then Negro freedom and citizenship: then the amalgamation of the 
black Africans and white Egyptians; and finally the whole Egyptians 
nation degenerated to a mongrel standard. And when the whole 
tribe had exchanged the majestic features of Ham for the “ginger 
cake" face of the modern Egyptian, it r/as with ease that Alexander 
file Great could crush this once powerful kingdom, B.C. 332. 

VOLUNTARY SEPARATION OF RACES 


At the earliest dawn of history the black race was found occu¬ 
pying Africa; the yellow race on the great basin of the Yellow 
River; and the white race in Egypt, extending its migratory move¬ 
ments over Southwestern Asia. The deluge had’ exterminated the 
mongrel tribes, and the races stpod before each other on their 
iexrt from the ark in full characteristics of their original types Th» 
African was black: the Turanian yellow, and the Caucasian white. 
No doxfbt each race had listened to the Dreaching of Noah and fully 
understood miscegnation as the cause that provoked the deluge'. 
Furthermore Noah had the divine right of “dominion” to order their 
'territorial separation, race from race; each to dwell on its own 
territory, under its own government, and to propogate its kind 
-through race unity ,n marriage. It is not unreasonable to suppose 
that these influences caused each race to choose its e W n territory 
upon which to propogate its kind. Ham’s descendants, domiciled 
TZ n T° US t ! rri . t0ry ‘° that 0CCU P ied ^ black race, thought 

terras rsst 

Egypt s glory departed” as the African blood increased in its vein"' 

(26) 


EVILS OF NEGRO SLAVERY 


The evils of Negro slavery cannot be overestimated nor the? 
institution too strongy condemned. The relation between the white 
master and the black slave is necessarily social, though unnatural 
and contaminating. Few nations have been able to escape race 
amalgamation through this inhuman institution. From the sons of 
Canaan, Sidon and Heth, spring the Jebusite, Amorite, Girgasite„ 
Hivite, Askite, Sinite, Arvadite, Zemarite, and the Hamathite, which 
were of mongrel blood, and bore the general title of Canaanites. 
This strain of Negro blood was undoubtedly, introduced into the 
white stock of Canaan through the black slave trade of Egypt. These 
mongrel Canaanites spread over the districts of Sidon, Gerar, Gaza,. 
Sodom and Gomorrah. Adma, Zeboim, and Lasha. (Gen. 10:15-19.) 
“Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities about them” were inhabited 
by the mongrel tribes of Canaan, who gave themselves over to for¬ 
nication and going after strange flesh,” thus following “the way of 
Cain.'* (Jude, verses 7-11.) 

On the monuments of Thebes, the ancient necropolis of Egypt, 
there still exists the efflgv of the origin of the institution of the 
black slave trade, a group of these unfortunate “beasts of the field/* 
in chains; and from this ancient relic of the INHUMANITY of hu¬ 
manity, a mental picture may be drawn of the source from whence 
African blood again entered the veins of the white man, and mon— 
grelism reinstituted the greatest of all world problems, namely, the. 
RACE PROBLEM . As in modern times the American race problem, 
had its origin in the hideous institution of Negro slavery, so the 
post-deluvian world race problem had its origin in the same institu¬ 
tion in the ancient days of Egypt’s crescent glory, calling for further 
divine intervention to preserve the image of God on earth from 
total extermination through universal miscegenation, the chief 
source of all moral corruption and intellectual and spiritual decline. 

THE CALL OF ABRAHAM 

“Now the Lord had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy coun¬ 
try, aifd from thy kindred, and from thy father’s house unto a land 
which I will show thee: and I will make of thee a great nation, and 
J will bless thee and make thy name great; and thou 
shalt be a blessing: and I will bless them that bless thee, and curse 
him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be 
blessed.” (Gen. 12:1-3.) 

In the call of Abraham we note the following great truths: (1> 
A call to migrate from Haran to Canaan or modern Palestine. Abram 
was of direct descent of Adam through Seth, Noah, and Shem, whose 
lineage had not gone “after strange flesh.” But through Canaan*.^ 
tribes mongrelism was rapidly spreading, threatening universal race 
amalgamation . It became necessary that God should choose a pure 
(27) 


strain of Adamic stock, that of his “seed” Messiah should b e born. 
This chosen stock should be segregated from the colored races, and 
all mongrel tribes, and from pure white tribes which tolerated race 
amalgamation; and domiciled on its own soil, with all colored and 
mongrel tribes excluded from its borders, and its citizens placed 
under covenant with God to keep the white blood pure. This cov¬ 
enant relation with God was established in the LAND OF CANAAN 
which at the CALL OF ABRAHAM, was OCCUPIED by the 
mongrel tribes of Canaan, after whom this historic district was 
named. The call of Abraham was a call to aggression upon this 
mongrel State of licentious idolators, and to conquest, and future 
occupancy, under national covenant relation with God. The found¬ 
ing of the great WHITE STATE of PALESTINE upon the exalted 
principles of WHITE RACE UNITY, and TERRITORIAL SEGRE¬ 
GATION OF RACES, and WHITE RACE DOMINION in RIGHT¬ 
EOUSNESS; the BIRTH OF CHRIST and of CHRISTIANITY 0 n 
its soil, were objects of the call of God to Abraham to leave Haran 
and to enter Canaan, exterminate or banish its mongrel, criminal in¬ 
habitants, and upon its soil, make of his seed a “Great Nation.” 


(2) “A GREAT NAME” for Abraham, as the progenitor of a 
“great nation,” was necessary to give force in sacred history to the 
sublimity and beneficence of the essential purposes of his high mis¬ 
sion, and the eternal friuts of its faithful performance. To the 
Jew, the prince of patriarchs; to the Christian, “father of the faith¬ 
ful”; in standing with Divinity, the “friend of God.” Where the 
Bible is read, in all ages and countries, this promise of God contin¬ 
ues to aggrandize the name of Abraham. 


(3) A GREAT NATION,” was also promised for Abraham’s 
response to God’s call. This nation should be of the direct descent 
of Abraham. This promise was verified in the land of Canaan, once 
the great center of mongrelism, degeneracy and licentious pagan¬ 
ism . The ^pcient Hebrew, the Israelite, the represents of which 
is the modern Jew, of a pure Adamic strain, was, and is^ the per¬ 
sonification of the verification of this promise of God. If we value 
the Bible and Christianity as exceeding all other blessings,*we must 
concede the excellent greatness of the once powerful Hebrew nation: 

for every lme °f the Bible, and every principle and virtue of 
Chnstiamty has come to the world through this one great nation to 
which the modern Jew, though denationalized and dispersed among 
the natrons, is a living and an essential witness. 

(4) Through the faithfulness of Abraham to this call “AT T 
the FAMILIES” or RACES “of the earth” should be blessed ” Tht 
universal blessing should come to the world through the person of 

genealogy “of Adam « *• of the 


( 28 ) 


POLITICS OF THE “GREAT NATION" 

The founding of a great white State, with a great temple dedi¬ 
cated to the worship of God, located at its national capital, was the 
political purpose of God in the call of Abraham. A political gov¬ 
ernment safeguarding the original purposes of God in creation, with 
laws in harmony with the laws of nature, was contemplated in the 
call of Abraham. Such laws would create a regime favorable to the 
establishment, progress and ultimate development of a revealed re¬ 
ligion; and for moral, social, and intellectual development of .the 
citizens; and for the higher walks of civilization generally; and for 
thP national union, prosperity and contentment of its people. A 
government creating and maintaining environments and a national 
moral atmosphere favorable to a pure spiritual religion, was design¬ 
er? in the call, as an essential provision for the ultimate development 
of the plan of redemption, so graciously begun in the creation of 
Adam in the image of “God manifest in the flesh." Such a political 
government was, through a course of decades, and a line of Abra¬ 
ham’s descendants, established, with its courts and judges. 

4 / THE CODE OF PALESTINE 

The code of the historic State of Palestine was written by Moses 
during the “forty years wandering in the wilderness,” and is known 
as the Law of Moses. I deem it necessary to mention only a few of 
the principal laws, those that make prominent the general features 
of the political government of the “Great Nation.” These are: (1) 
The Law of Race Standardization. Circumcision. (Gen. 12:1-3.) 
This was the National Covenant given to Abraham as the father of 
this “Great Nation;” the covenant under which he and his posterity 
should possess the Land of Canaan. (Gen. 17:8-11.) Th* rite ef 
circumcision of the genital organ pf-the male descendants of Abra¬ 
ham was a vow to conform to God’s Law of RACE UNITY IN 
MARRIAGE, and of RACE UNITY of the STATE. Under this law 
the “GREAT NATION” should “walk with God” as did Noah, and 
be found “perfect in his generations for all time to come. 

(2) THE STANDARDIZATION OF LIVE STOCK "and of 
FARM PRODUTS. “Thou shalt not let thy cattle gender with a 
diverse kind.” Thou shalt not sow thy field with mingled seed.” 
(Lev: 19:19.) 

73) STANDARDIZED COMMERCE for HONEST BUSINESS. 
“Just balances, just weights, a just epha, and a just hin shall ye 
have.” (Lev. 19:36.) 

Standardization was the prominent phase of the political gov¬ 
ernment of the State of Palestine. It was pure democracy, ad¬ 
ministered by judges until the days of Saul, when against the will 
of God, the people chose a king. (Sam. 8:4-8.) 

(29) 


In all the world's history, a parellel to the Jewish Democracy* 
from Abraham to Saul, a period of about 800 years, can not be 
found. Its citizens of one race, its live stock of pure breds, its; 
agricultural products of pure type, its markets stabilized upon the 
basis of national justice. Throughout the State reigned the eternal 
fitness of things. This splendid government became stabilized on 
the territory of Palestine under Joshua, and continued as a stabiliz¬ 
ed, democratic government on the soil of Palestine, for more than 
four centuries, when it degenerated to an executive monarchy. Still 
its kings could not legislate. The Law of Moses was its code. But 
while this splendid form of Government characterized the State of 
Palestine, the citizens did not equal in piety the Sethites of the 
GOLDEN AGE. This lower standard of piety was due to the con¬ 
tact of the Israelites with the mongrel tribes of the Canaanites. 
(Judges 3:5-7; Ex. 34:10-16.) 

RELIGIOUS CREED OF PALESTINE 


The Ten Commandments was the religious creed of the Jews. 
This creed is written without penalties attached providing for cor¬ 
poral punishment, since it provided for the salvation of the soul, and 
for future rewards and punishments. (Ex. 20:1-17.) 

The ordinances of the Hebrew church are declared next after 
the religious creed, providing for a sacrificial system of worship. 
(Ex. 20:24-26.) Then follows the civil and criminal laws, as found 
in the books of Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. It is im¬ 
portant to note that the laws of the State were in harmony with its. 
religious creed, and with its general religious system, creating en¬ 
vironments favorable to the progress of a pure spiritual religion. 
CHURCH AND STATE SEPARATE 
It is an error, generally held, that the Jewish Church and State- 
•vere one. The Judges and the citizens, in every day life renre, 
sented the State. The priests and the devout worshippers, when con¬ 
gregated about the Tabernacle and the temple, represented the 
church or Congregation of Israel. 

COLORED RACE IDOLATERS 

From time immemorial, the colored races have worshipped idols 

In every age known to history the black dwellers of Africa have 

z w ir^ sed tbe “' before ^—t: .„7*e ye ;: 

low folk of China and Japan have had their “kitchen gods ” Today 

missionaries Th 6 th « wi^ and levout 

missionaries the native Africans and Mongolians, are, as nations 

enlio-ht ? n ' S T after eVery necessar y opportunity for Christian 

rx". r-z .r - •sa&srasss* 


( 30 ) 


RACIAL TYPES OF THE CANAANITES 

We must not thing of the Canaanites, who were divided who 
were divided into numerous smaller tribes 0 f “ites”,” as uniform 
in racial type and color. There was the pure white stock of Noah; 
the full blood African; the full blood Turanian, and the mongrel off¬ 
spring of all these races commingling, with no provision against 
miscegnation. This mass of mongrels was given over to idolatry 
and licentious crime and volence. 

RACE EXTERMINATION 

“But these are natural brute beasts, made to be taken and de¬ 
stroyed, speak evil of the things that they understood not.” (2 Pet. 
2:12.) At first thought, this seems as a merciless policy, and as 
unwarranted vengenace upon unfortunate humanity. Yet in unmis¬ 
takable terms the reason is given, and will satisfy any fair mind 
which prizes Christianity and higher civilization. The willful 
ignorance and criminality of these “natural brute beast” races are 
further described as follows: 

“Because that when they knew God, they glorified him not as 
God, neither were thankful, but became vain in their imaginations, 
and their foolish hearts were darkened.” “Wherefore God also 
gave them up to uncleanness, through the lusts of their own hearts, 
to dishonor their own bodies between themselves: who changed the 
truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature 
rather than the creator.” (Rom. 1:21, 24, 25.) 

There is not a race on earth toay that has not had the advan¬ 
tage of a knowledge of the true God. This is attested in their 
worship of idols, which is a corrupted form of revealed religion; in 
which they have, in ages past, “changed the truth of God into a lie,” 
and worshipped the creature instead of the Creator.” For this will¬ 
ful ignorance, blasphemous idolatry, and wanton criminality, God, 
through the “chosen seed of Abraham” as his agents and soldiers 
under command, “destroyed seven nations” of these “natural brute 
beasts” out of the Land of Canaan. (Ac. 13:17-19.) 

REASONS FOR RACE EXTERMINATION 

“When the Lord thy God shall bring thee into the land whither 
thou goest to possess it, and hath cast out many nations before thee, 
the Hittites, and the Girgashites, and the Amorites, and the Canaan¬ 
ites, and the Perzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites, seven na¬ 
tions greater and mightier than thou; and when the Lord thy God 
shall deliver them before thee, thou shalt smite them, and utterly 
destroy them, thou shalt make no covenant with them, nor show 
mercy unto them: neither shalt thou make marriages with them: thy 
daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt 
thou take unto thy son. For they will turn away thy son from fol¬ 
lowing me, that they may serve other Gods: So will the anger of the 

(31) 


Lord be kindled against you, and destroy thee suddenly. But thus 

shall ye deal with them; ye shall destroy their altars, and break 

down their images, and cut down their -groves, and burn the a 
graven images with fire. For thou art an holy people unto the Lord 
thy God :• the Lord thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people 
unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth.” 
(Deut. 7:1-6.) To spare such races was only to permit million^ 
more to come into existence only to follow the same course and meet 
the same eternal doom. But worse still was their contaminating 
influence upon the ‘‘CHOSEN RACE” which threatened to engulf 
the world in mongrelism and heathenism. 

ELECTION AND PREDESTINATION 


No doctrine is more plainly taught in the Bible than the doc¬ 
trine of election and predestination, and no doctrine has been more 
generally misunderstood, nor more harmfully misapplied. The word 
‘‘election” mean CHOICE. The. word ‘'predestination” means to 
ordain beforehand the accomplishment of the object of such choice, 
that the will of God should not be defeated. The plan of God in 
election, foreordination, or predestination, has respect to the differ¬ 
ent races; and to the PLAN OF SALVATION, and not to the access 
of the individual to the benefits of the plan of human redemption. 
Election excluded the PRE-ADAMIC RACES from all participation 
in the PLAN, but opened the way for their participation in its bene¬ 
fits through willing faith and obedience. It made choice of the 
Adamic race in which the plan of redemption should be'materialized, 
and through which it should be kept before the other races. 


ELEMENTS OF THE PLAN OF SALVATION 


The plan of salvation consisted of the following elements: (1) 
Divinity, as the one and only source of eternal life: so that salvation 
should not be “Of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of 
God.that sheweth mercy.” (Rom. 9:16.) This provision reveals God 
as the only Savious; His throne as the only altar of forveness; His 
Spirit the only life; the Author of every good and perfect gift, that 
to him alone every individual should look, and live, or perish. In 
the works of election and predestination which foreordained the 
plan of Salvation man had no part. It was all complete in the mind 
and puipose of God when it was said, “Let us make man in our own 
image,” so the plan was all of God and came upon the world as a 
free gift.” (St. John 1:1-14. Rom. 5:18.) 

It was the sovereign will of God that declared of Jesus Christ, 
“Behold, I lay in Sion a Chief Corner-Stone, ELECT, and precious: 
and he that believeth on Him shall not be confounded.” (I. Peter 
2-.G ) Thus in the Sion of Redemption, Christ, by election, stood as 
a Lamb that had been slain, from the foundation of tl e world ” 
(I. Peter 1:19. 20: Rev. 13:8.1 


( 32 ) 


(2) The white race of men was chosen as the “elect” races, in 
which God should perfect his Sion of redemption, and from which 
he should “call” his prophets and apostles, and inspire them with 
messages to the rest of mankind. Certainly this choice of the white 
race began with Adam and Eve, of whom Messiah should be born. 
Ths election of the white race to participation with God in the Sion 
of Redemption, was revealed to the world in the call of Abraham 
to leave Haran and to found the great white nation of Hebrews, 
which should subsequently found the State of Palestine on the pol¬ 
icy of white race unity of the nation, safeguarded by the territorial 
separation of races. The divine policy of the State of Palestine 
was to keep the white race pure, and in communion with God, that 
the plan of salvation should be ultimately consummated and this was 
the sublime purport of the law of circumcision. 

(3) The Holy Scriptures, given by inspiration of God to the 
world, through chosen men of the white race, was the third element 
in the Sion of salvation - 

PLAN OF SALVATION COMPLETE 
The plan of salvation was first revealed to our first parents 
when the sentence of physcal death was passed on the original sin, 
when God promised that of Eve’s “seed” should come one who 
should bruise the serpent’s head, (Gen. 3:15) and kept before the 
world through devout worshippers and prophets of the white race, 
until the birth of Jesus, which revealed the very foundation of the 
whole plan of salvation, which was Christ the “Chief Corner-Stone.” 
The death, and resurrection and ascension of Jesus; the gift of the 
Holy Spirit in his name; and the completion of the New Testament 
Scriptures with the Kingdom of God among men, completed the 
plan ef salvation. 

COLORED RACES EXCLUDED 

From the days of Adam to the day of Pentecost, when the 
church received the baptism of the Holy Spirit as the sign and seal 
of Christ’s true Messiahship, not a member of a colored race had 
figured in the plan of redemption. Christ had carefully selected 
his disciples and apostles from the Jews, a “remnant” of the pure 
white stock of Adam, whom God had chosen as his “elect nation.” 
(Is. 45:4.) Thus God, through the election of the white race, ex¬ 
cluded the colored races from participation in the development of 
the plan of human redemption. It was not until after his resur¬ 
rection that Jesus commanded that his gospel be preached to “every 
creature among all nations,” and that was not to begin until the 
Holy Spirit was given at Pentecost to complete the plan of salva¬ 
tion. SOLOMON NOT A NEGRO 

The theory foisted upon the public by certain negropholistic 
religious teachers, that “Solomon was a negro,” is a willful perver¬ 
sion of the word of God. Solomon was the son of an exceedingly 

(33) 


beautiful woman, and his father was David the king, ofpmeAam- 
ic stock. (XI. Sam. 11:2, 3, 26, 27; II. Sam. 12:24 ) The Shulamite 
complained in poetry: “I am black but comely. ’ “Look not upon 
me, because I am black, because the sun hath looked upon me: my 
mother’s children were angry with me; they made me keeper of the 
-vineyards.” This woman here explains that in working in the vine 
yards she had become “black” from “sun” tan. (Song of Solomon 
1:5,6.) Of Solomon she sang: “My beloved is white and ru y. 
(Song 5:10.) Solomon was of pure white Adamic stock. 

ELECTION DID NOT SAVE THE RACE 


The election of the white race, as the chosen race in which the 
purpose of God in grace should be accomplished, did not sav e the 
individual, not even those who wore the sign of circumcision, which 
“believed not.” (Jude 5.) All Israel was included in “election,” 
and were “called by name,” yet only those who sought salvation by 
willing faith and obedience obtained it. (Heb. 3:16-19.) 

DECREES OF GOD 

The foreknowledge of God decreed that true believers shall be 
saved, and that unbelievers shall be damned, and this decree applies 
to every human “creature.” (Matt. 16:15, 16; St. John 3:16,17,36.) 

So far from election and predestination hindering the salvation 
of any race, or of any individual, it is the very means by which each 
and all may be saved. The decree of God in fixing the eternal 
destinies of men is based on the character of the individual, and 
while it compels men to choose between right and wrong, it leaves 
them free in the choice, then assigns to each his future destiny ac¬ 
cording to the choice made. 

ONE WAY TO BE SAVED 


There is but one way to be saved, and that is “by grace through 
faith.” (Eph. 2:8.) Election, predestination and foreordination, are 
the works of the foreknowledge and predeterminate counsel of God, 
and did no more than furnish the plan of salvation. Its benefits 
must be secured by grace through faith. Even those whose accept¬ 
ance of God was foreseen from creation all down the ages, and who 
were on this account made a part of the plan 0 f salvation, as proph¬ 
ets and teachers, and as faithful servants of righteousness, which 
were and still are essential elements in God’s plan of saving men, 
must become the children and heirs of God through faith. (Rom. 
8:28-30, with Rom. 4:16; Eph. 1:4-12; Eph. 2:8-10; Gal. 3:26.) 

In a great ship, only certain material is chosen in its construct¬ 
ion, and all other material excluded, yet the excluded material may 
be a valuable part of its cargo, and highly valuable for other pur¬ 
poses than ship construction. It is just so with the plan of salvation. 

as hmfsW n i s gr °v. and Turanian from the plan of salvation 

"> -** «■* 

U.u awen ooaily, did not, and does not debar them 
(34) 


from accepting the plan and securing eternal life They are excluded 
from salvation by their voluntary rejection or willful neglect of the 
plan of salvation; and this is true of the individual of the white 
race. So the native African and native Turanian are responsible 
for their backwardness in spiritual development. They are, as na¬ 
tions, as impervious and irresponsible to the gospel of God today as 
they were a thousand years ago. 

JUDGMENT OF GOAT NATIONS 

“When the son of man shall come in his glory, and all the 
holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of glory: and 
before hm shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them 
one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats: 
and he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the 
left.” “Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, 
ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from 
the foundation of the world: for I was hungered, and ye gave me 
meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye 
took me in: naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited 
me : I was in prison, and ye came unto me. Then shall the 
righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungered f 
and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink?” “When saw we thee 
a stranger, and took thee in? or naked and clothed thee? or when 
saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee? And the King 
shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, inasmuch 
as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye 
have done it 'unto me.” 

“Then shall he say unto them on the left hand. Depart from 
me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his 
angels: for I was a hungered, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, 
and ye gave me no drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: 
naked, and ye clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited 
me not.” 

“Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we 
thee an hungered, or a thirst, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or In 
prison, and did not minister unto thee?” Then shall he answer them, 
saying. Verily. T gay unto you, inasmuch as ye did it not to one of 
the least of these ye did it not to me. And these shall go away into 
everlasting punishment.” Matt. 25:31-46. 

These passages relate to the judgment of nations, that shall 
mark the opening of the Millenlial Age, in which “Satan shall be 
bound for a thousand years.” (Rev. 20:1-6.) All during: the Millen- 
ial Reign these GOAT NATIONS, overawed into submission to the 
reign of righteousness, will continue in an unregenerate state, and 
when the spirit of evil is “loosed for a little season, after the 
thousand years is finished, they will become a great army in re¬ 
volt against the saints, which, when marshaled into battle array 

(35) 


shall meet swift and fiery destruction at he fiat » f God, ( and at th 
last great judgment, “shall go away into the lake of fire. (R-t. 20. 
7-15 ) It is an egregious error to confuse this judgment of nation, 
with the judgment of individuals that shall take place in the last 
great judgment in which each receives the final doom. It is a judg¬ 
ment of national policies in regard to Judaism and Christianity. 
FroTYi thp days of Moses and Aaron to the present, mongrel Egypt, 
and the black and yellow nations of the world, have either opposed 
or willfully negrlected the Holy'Bible and the principles of the true 
religion which it reveals. The miracles of Moses revealed the power 
and glory of God to all Egypt, and opened wide an opportunity for 
both individual and national repentance and spiritual enlightenment 
but when the mongrel Egyptians knew God, they glorified him not 
as God.” Every white nation on the globe has fostered Christianity 
at the hand of some Christian sect, from the days of Constantine 
the Great, who, as emperor of the Roman Empire, brought Christ¬ 
ianity under protection of the State in A.D. 325, to the present 
day. While in early times, sect outlawed sect, still under some re¬ 
ligious creed, Christianity has been fostered by the white States 
generally. But what has Africa, China, or Japan done for Christian¬ 
ity? In what age has either put its government behind Christianity 
or by its national policy bid the “brethren” of Christ welcome to 
its soil, its homes, or the hearts and lives of its citizens? Have not 
these “goat” nations kept their national doors closed against Christ? 
Have they earned any better title religiously, morally or socially 
than that of beast of the field? How can these “goats” stand before 
Christ, the “Son of Man,” in a national judgment? 


FEW COLORED PEOPLE SAVED 

Turning to the final close of the gospel age, when the career of 
all races ends in a final count, we have (1) Of the white Gentiles, 
who, by the new birth of the Spirit, were made the “spiritual seed 
of Abraham,” and by “circumcision of the Spirit” made to be “Jews 
inwardly. (Rom. 2:29.) a multitude of the saved greater than 
could be “numbered.” (Rev. 7:9.) (2) Of the tribes of Israel who 
were Jews physically, nationally and spiritually, were saved “one 
hundred and forty four thousand.” (Rev. 7:4-8. Rev. 14:1.) (3) Of 
the beast” or “goat” races, the number of the saved is indicated 
by the significant number “four,” indicating the very few of the 
colored races the white Christians have been able to lead to Christ. 
(Rev. 4:6-9; Rev. 5:6; Rev. 6:1-7.) Admitting that the numbers 
here mentioned are not to be taken as limiting the possibility of 
salvation of the Jews to exact figures, nor of the colored and mon¬ 
grel races to exactly “four, it must be admitted that these figures 

of e a n e cT e ? t0 md ‘ cate the relative attitudes of the different races 
of all countries and ages toward Christianity. 

( 36 ) 


BEAST RACE DOCTRINES TESTED 

I have contended that the colored races, though human beings 
which are possessed of spirit and soul, accountable to God, and have 
free access to his grace, are known in the Scriptures by the titles 
“beast,” or “beasts of the earth,” or “beast of the field.” I have 
admitted that fourfooted animals are called by the same name. I 
am also aware that the law of Moses required the death of four- 
footed beasts which proved dangerous to human" life 4 but in all such 
cases the animal is named, so there can be no mistake as' to "the kind 
of creature meant. (Ex. 21:28,29.) There is no mention of such 
animals having “hands,” or of having “iniquity in their hand's,” nor 
of their “lying with a man or with a woman” in the sin of forma¬ 
tion, nor of their wearing “sackcloth,” nor of their “turning from 
their evil way,” nor of their conversing in human speech, nor “cry¬ 
ing unto God” in repentance. I have clearly showed, by unfigura— 
tive passages of Scripture, that a “beast” thus bearing the descrip¬ 
tion of a human being, was created prior to the creation of Adam, 
that the same kind of beast passed through the deluge in the Ark 
with Noah, and with Noah and his sons received th e law from God 
against murder, and the contact of this BEAST with MAN in suc¬ 
cessive ages. I have declared that these older races are only beasts 
as compared with the superior race which bears the likeness of God; 
that as compared with fourfooted beasts they are human beings; 
that for the sublime works of divine inspiration, and the indwelling 
of “the Godhead,” and the shedding of the “precious blood that 
cleanseth from all sin,” they were wholly unfitted by nature; that 
they lack the likeness of God; that so far as fitness for these higher 
relations with God, as races, they are “unclean beasts” in this 
sense. I have declared that though excluded from its benefits; that 
after God has been revealed to them, with a full revelation of the 
plan of salvation that they did not and do “not like to retain God. in 
their knowledge,” but turn from him and “worship the “creature in 
preference to the Creator;” that this is the only reason why the col¬ 
ored nations are in heathenism today. No Bible scholar who is a 
historian will undertake to dispute that this Bible account of the 
colored races has been the literal facts of secular history in all past 
ages, nor that they fill exactly that description today. China, with 
a population of four hundred and fifty millions, and Japan with 
forty millions, which, with the yellow mongrel nations, comprise ap¬ 
proximately half the population of the world, are still practically in 
heathenism. The black race of perhaps two hundred millions pop¬ 
ulation, is still in heathen darkness, except in Liberia and America, 
and even in America the morality and piety of the black “saint” is 
not equal to that of the “white saint,” due to the natural superior¬ 
ity of the white race, physically and intellectually. The Scriptural 
description which I have produced of this peculiar species of beast 

"(37) 


is exactly duplicated in the black and yellow races of today. And 
unless the Bible furnishes an account of the black and yellow races 
as to their origin and the part they have played on the world s 
great drama, and the duties of the white man respecting them, un¬ 
der the titles of “beasts” and “goats,” then it must be admitted that 
the Bible gives no account if these races at all, for there is not one 
word in all the Scriptures that states or implies that the Negro or 
the Turanian, both of which are as different from each other, pyhsi- 
eally and psychically, as are both from the white race, sprang from 
Cain, or from Ham, or Canaan, or any other member of the white 
race. The many “ites” that sprang from Canaan (Gen. 10:15-18) 
seem to indicate that his tribe amalgamated with both the black and 
yellow races, and this is confirmed by ancient history. But that 
the Negro had no existence prior to Noah’s “drunken curse” upon 
Canaan, and that his “curse” created the Negro through Ham, or 
Canaan, or any one else, is as unscriptural as it is unreasonable. 
There is not one letter of proof in the Bible, nor in ancient history, 
that Negro slavery ever existed among the Hebrews or Jews as a 
nation, and yet they were were the descendants of Shem, whom 
Noah, in his drunken rage, swore that Canaan, not his posterity, 
should serve . While a voluntary system of white race servitude ex¬ 
isted among the Hebrews, in which Hebrew bought Hebrew, (Ex. 
21:1-11) there is no evidence that Negro slavery existed among 
them. The beast race theory, as I have presented it, is literally 
true, whether the passages I have cited in its support were intended 
to teach it or not, and as these races exist, and have so vitally af¬ 
fected the interests of the white race, it seems incredible that the 
Bible should mention every other creature and leave the colored 
races out; and until nature perverts itself, and pure black Negroes 
are born of pure white parents, I shall hold that the Bible does give 
an account of them, and calls them “beasts” and “goats;” that 
these titles ar e prophetic of their inferiority as compared with- the 
white races and of their backwardness in science, art, and religion, 
and that in every age and country they have fulfilled this prophecy 
to the letter. The BEAST RACE THEORY is proven by test. 


ISRAEL CONTAMINATED 

The colored and mongrel races, which were “strange flesh” to 
the Adamic race, were to be driven out of the State of Palestine, 

“hL«t f 1 T Ch VaCant territor y become the haunts of 

at That rim \ ° \ m ° re fi6rCe 3nd wMer which was 

at that time, known as the “Hornet” tribe. (Deut. 7:20-24 ) The 

(JeTTsT b IIitT the“Horonite,” ( Neh . i 3: 28) of “Horoniam,” 

sT Josh 24 121 R T rrr 168 t0 the Cana * n ites. (Ex. 23:27- 
61 ’ Josh. 24.12.) But should Israel form an oiKunn ux. ^ 
“Hornets” which were also of tho alliance with the 

... ss* 


undesirable as the Canaanites and the other “ites.” S 0 the policy 
was that Israel should maintain strict race segregation from the 
Hornets as from the “ites” and conduct successive campaigns 
against the whole as a territory was needed and as the Hornets, by 
incessant war on the various tribes of the Canaanites, opened the 
way for Israels success. Thus by civic righteousness, strategy and 
valor, Israel was to finally rid Palestine of every tribe except the 
circumcised seed of Abraham, a pure strain of Adamic stock. For 
this purpose the State bounds of Palestine were established by the 
providence of God. (Ex. 23:27-31.) But this order of God was, 
from time to time, violated by the Israelites. They repeatedly 
amalgamted with the aborigines of the Land of Canaan despite the 
commandments of God, and were as often chastised by the nations 
from which God had separated his “elect people” as a royal nation. 

But the final calamity came while Jehoviakim was king of Ju¬ 
dah, when Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, besieged and took 
Jerusalem, and carried the Hebrew leaders with the vessels of the 
holy temple, into captivity. (II. K. 24:1-16.) 

CAUSE OF THE FALL OF JERUSALEM 

When the Jews returned to rebuild Jerusalem, they first enter-^ 
ed into a general revival, with confession of their sins and prayers 
for forgiveness, and with the enforcement of national law, for the 
regeneration of the State as as well as of the Church. Ezra was 
their leader in this great revival. During the progress of this. 

. course of reformation the “princes,” or statesmen of Judah, called 
the attention of Ezra, the “pastor evangelist,” to the “chief sin” 
which caused the fall of Jerusalem and the State of Palestine. That 
SIN was found to be MISCEGENATION. Note the following clear 
statement of this important fact: 

“Now when these things were done, the princes came to me, 
(Ezra) saying, The people of Israel and the priests, and the Levites, 
have not separated themselves from the people of the lands, doing 
according to 1 their abominations, even of the Canaanites, the Hit— 
tites, the Perizzites, the Jebusites, the Ammonites, the Moabites, the 
Egyptians, and the Amorites: for they have taken of their daughter 
for themselves and for their sons: so that the holy seed have mingl¬ 
ed themselves with the people of those lands: yea, the hand of the 
princes and rulers hath been chief in this trespass.” (Ez. 9:1, 2.) 
Here the sin which led to the fall of the “Elect Nation” is clearly 
defined to be Miscegenation. 

CHIEF SIN MINGLING WITH BEASTS 
The chief sin of the white nations, in every age and country, 
has been their amalgamation with the BEAST RACES. .Note the 
following plain proof: 

“Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to define thyself therwith: 
neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto: 
it is confusion (miscegenation).” (39) 


“Defile not ye yourselves in any of these things: for in all these 
the nations are defiled which I cast out before you: and the land is 
defiled: therefore I do visit the iniquity thereof upon it, and the 
land itself vomiteth out her inhabitants.” “Ye shall therefore keep 
my statutes and my judgments, and shall not commit any of these 
abominations; neither any of your own nation, nor any stranger 
that sojourneth among you: for all these abominations have the 
men of the land done, which were before you, and the land is defil¬ 
ed; that the land spue not you out also, when ye defile it, as it spued 
out the naions that were before you.” (Lev. 18:23-28.) We note in 
this connection (1) That “mingling” with “beasts” was the chief 
sin of the Gentile nations of Canaan. (2) That for this sin these 
nations were driven out of Canaan to give place to the Israelites. 

(3) That for a like cause the Israelites should also ibe driven out. 

(4) That for intermarriage with the races which mingled with 
beasts the Israelites were carried away unto Babylon in captivity. 
(Ezra 9:1. 2, 10-14.) 

God forbid that any Baptist preacher should declare that the 
white sons and daughters of Adam made their social relations with 
fourfooted beasts a national policy. Undoubtedly the law against 
carnal relations between man and beast is a law against such rela¬ 
tions between the white race and the colored races, and the term 
beast is applied to such races to express the “abomination” of mis¬ 
cegenation, in which the white man becomes as filthy, and detestable 
as if he were guilty with a fourfooted beast. 

SEVERE MEASURES AGAINST MISCEGENATION 

“Now when Ezra had prayed, and when he had confessed, weep¬ 
ing and casting himself down before the house of God, there assem¬ 
bled unto him out of Israel a very great congregation of men and 
wnmfin and children: fon the people wept very sore.” 

“And Shechaniah the son of Jehiel, one of the sons of Elam, 
answered and said unto Ezra, We have trespassed against our God, 
and have taken strange wives of the people of the land: yet now 
there is hope in Israel concerning this thing.” “Now therefore let 
us make a covenant with our God to put away all the wives, and 
such as are born of them, according to the counsel of my Lord, and 
of those that tremble a tthe command of our God; and let it be done 
according to the Law.” (Ezra 9:1-3.) 

“And they made proclamation throughout Judah and Jerusalem 
unto all the children of the captivity that they should gather them¬ 
selves together unto Jerusalem: and that whosoever would not come 
within three days, according to the counsel of the princes and the 
elders, all his substance should be forfeited, and himself separated 
from the congregation of those that had been carried away.” 

“Then all the men of Judah and Benjamin gathered themselves 
together unto Jerusalem within three days.” It was the ninth 

(40) 


month, on the twentieth day of the month 
the street of the house of God, trembling 
and for the «Teat rain." 


and all the 
because of 


people sat in 
this matter, 


And Ezra the priest stood up and said unto them, Ye have 
ransgressed, and have taken strange wives to increase the trespass 
o srael ‘ Now therefore make confession unto the Lord God 
o youi at ers and do his pleasure: and separate yourselves from 
t e people of the land, and from the strange wives,” “Then all the 
congregation answered and said with a loud voice, As thou hast 
said, so must we do.” (Ezra 10:7-12.) 

“And they made an end with all the men that had taken strange 
wives by the first day of the first month.” (Ezra 10:17.) 

GOD A RACE SEGREGATIONIST 


The great religious revival at Jerusalem on the return of the 
Jews from the Babylonian captivity, puts the great CREATOR in 
the clearest light as a RACE SEGREGATIONIST, and the author 
of the Territorial separation of races, and of the race unity of the 
family and of the nation. A pure black race; a pure yellow race; 
and a pure white race, each to dwell separate from the others on its 
own territory, that each race may fill the sphere and accomplish the 
purpose for which it was created, is the order of God. Th e means 
which God has ordained for this standardization of races, are (1) 
The creation of the “male with his female.” (2) The law requiring 
that the husband and his wife shall be of one flesh.” (3) The law of 
circumcision which was the law against intermarriage of the white 
race with colored races. 

The measures which God has employed against race amalgama¬ 
tion are (1) The creation of the races distinctly in form, in color, 
and in intellectual capacity. (2) The placing of Adam and Eve in 
the Garden as their own territory. (3) Putting enmity between the 
“serpent” races and the “seed” of Eve. (4) The banishment of 
Cain “at whose door lay the sin of going after strange flesh,” which 
resulted in the murder of Aibel. (3) The extermination of Cain's 
mongrel tribe by the deluge, and the preservation of the one white 
family of Noah which were “perfect in their generations:” and the 
preservation of one “male and his female” of each colored race, in 
full blood, as “beasts that are not clean.” (6) The call of Abra¬ 
ham and the founding of the State of Palestine on the policy of 
the territorial separation of races, and of race unity in marriage- 
(7) The punishment, by national disaster, of the citizens of Pales¬ 
tine for violation of its race lawfc. 

Thus God has revealed himself to the world as opposed to race 
amalgamation as contrary to his purposes in creation, and by his se¬ 
vere judgments upon the violation of his will in his essential pro¬ 
visions against it, he has revealed the abomination and destructive 
consequences of this crime against nature and presumption against 
Divinity. (41) 


RACE UNITY RESTORED IN PALESTINE 

On their return to Palestine, and the great reformation which 
they launched, the Jews seem to have gotten a truer and deeper 
view of the law of circumcision, and the command of God to rid the 
State of all colored and mongrel races, and to maintain the race 
unity of the family and of the nation. They came to view GOD as 
the omninotent RAGE SEGREGATIONIST, and to realize that no 
nation could escape calamity that disregarded his provisions for the 
race unity of nations. They adopted his divine policy as the law 
of their nation. The strange wives and their mongrel offspring 
were “put away," and “they made an end with all the men that had 
taken strange wives.” The law of God stood supreme. Race unity 
of the nation was restored. Idolatry was forever eliminated from 
Israel. 

GOD MAKES NATIONS OF ONE BLOOD 

“And hath made of ONE BLOOD all nations of men for to 
dwell on all the face of the earth, and determined the times before 
appointed, and the BOUNDS of their HABITATION that they 
should seek the Lord.” (Ac. 17:24-27.) Perhaps no passage of 
God’s word has been more generally perverted than that just cited. 
Negropholists invariably quote it in favor of racial equality, in 
their attempts to prove that “God has made all the different RACES 
of the same blood.” The passage does not assert that God has 
made of one blood all RACES. Between the CREATION of a 
RACE, and the FORMATION of a NATION, there is an essential 
difference. To use the words RACE and NATION as perfect syno- 
nims is evidence of poor scholarship. The two words are radically 
and essentially different in orthography and meaning. The noun 
race is used to distinguish peoples in regard to form and color, and 
properly paraphrased by the adjectives, WHITE or BLACK, or 
YELLOW. The word NATION is used to designate a body of 
people as living on the same territory, under the same government, 
speaking the same language. The passage under consideration de¬ 
clares that such bodies of people God makes “of ONE BLOOD,” and 
not of different bloods or races. The nations are properly distin¬ 
guished by the same adjectives that distinguish the races: but when 
a nation is made up, as is America, of all races, then an unnatural 
term must be employed to distinguish it from other nations, as the 
“American nation,” “Latin nations, etc.” 

MAN MADE NATIONS VS. GOD MADE NATIONS 

If we are to accord any credence to the Bible, we are forced 
by its teachings to admit that there are the God-made nations, and 
the man-made nations, as there are the God-made races and the 
man-made races. What Baptist preacher will declare that God 
created the mulatto of America? or deny that he is the creature of 
the white man’s most abominable crime? Certainly the mongrel 

(42) 



i^aces are e creatures of God. The mixed nations are the crea¬ 
tures of God s violated law, the infraction of every divine edict that 
constiucted the great State of Palestine, and which distinguished 
its citizens as of “ONE BLOOD” racially. Upon the blood unity 
of Palestine depended its natonal existence. Certainly God made 
through his precepts, the great Jewish nation of th e “one blood” of 
Abram, wh 0 was of pure white stock, a s is attested in the Jew of 
today. And as the passage declares, He “appointed” to the Jews 
the bounds of their habitation,” the state lines of Palestine, that 
this nation should never cease to “seek the Lord.” Every mixed na¬ 
tion is the creature of human ignorance and crime against nature 
and against the written Laws of God, and is in direct opposition to 
every purpose of God in making each State or nation of “one 
blood.” In every age and country the mixed nations have been 
characterized as idolatrous, incestuous, violent, and predisposed 
against Christianity. To misinterpret this passage to the support 
of racial equality and race mixture of nations is to put it in flat 
contradiction to the whole tenor of Bible teaching on the subject, 
and out of harmony with the call of Abraham and averse to' the 
racial policies of the Jews, a nation known to have been formed by 
the callings and commandments of God. 

PALESTINE THE PATTERN 

The State of Palestine was, beyond all question, the “Great 
Nation” which God promised to make of Abram. As already showu 
on previous pages, the cardinal national policies of the Jewish State 
of Palestine were (1) Race unity in marriage. (2) The territorial 
separation of different races, for the standardization of races in full 
blood, that his purposes in their creation might be accomplished. 
(3) Standardization of live stock and farm products. (4) A stan¬ 
dardized system of industry and of commerce for the reign of Jus¬ 
tice and honesty in business. These policies were founded in the 
written commandments of God, which gave existence and distinction 
to the great State of Palestine, a nation of God’s own make. In this 
way God makes nations. They are made by conformity to His one 
system of laws, designed for the formation, permancy and pros¬ 
perity of nations. These laws are fundamental, eternal, and un¬ 
changeable, and provide for a regime in conformity to the laws of 
nature; a scientific government, conducive to the physical, intellect¬ 
ual, moral, social and spiritual development of its citizens. The 
State of Palestine was a nation of God’s own institution, and was 
designed to be the pattern for all enlightened Christian nations; and 
those nations which do not conform to this pattern are not nations 
of God’s “make.” That God should violate his own pattern, and 
repudiate his own lqws my making mongrel nations is a s irreverent 
as it is preposterous and antiscriptural. 

ABRAHAM FATHER OF MANY NATIONS 

“Neither shall thy name any more be called Abram: but thy 

(43) 


name shall be Abraham: for a father of many nations have I made 
thee.” (Gen. 17:5.) 

Here Abraham was made to be a “father of many nations” through 
exemplarship. The other nations that should pattern after the 
Jewish nation in maintaining race unity in marriage, and race unity 
of the State, are Abrahamic nations, being of the one Caucasian 
family; as, for example, England and Germany. It is through 
Christian enlightenment that God makes a nation of “one blood.”' 
whether that nation be of the black race; or the yellow, or the white 
race. Nation building is a matter of law and policy in government. 
God istheauthor of Race Unity of the nation. The DEVIL is the 
author of race mixture of nations, and of the theory and practice 
of racial: equality. 

JESUS CHRIST A RACE SEGREGATIONIST 

Wf. come now to the supreme epitome of the whole matter of 
Scriptural Ethnology. The Saviour of all men was born under the 
regime of Race Unity of the State, within the bounds of Palestine, 
on the territory which God geographically segregated to a pure 
white tribe. He was circumcised when eight days of age. (Luke 2: 
21.) When He had chosen his church and his ministry out of the 
baptised desciples of John, his harbinger. He confined his ministry 
to the bounds of the State of Palestine, and restricted his gospel 
within the State to his own circumcised race, excluding the Gentiles 
who were then overrunning the State. (Matt. 10:1-7.) It is a most 
significant fact, that Jesus Christ, who bore in his divinity and in 
his humanity, the deepest love for all races, for “all the world;” and 
in whom dwelt all the fullness of the Godhead bodily, should be 
born in that State which was founded on the policies of Territorial 
Segregation of Races, the RACE UNITY of NATIONS, and WHITE 
RACE SUPREMACY, and live in strict conformity to these policies 
and then hallow them in his death, and sublimate these same cardi¬ 
nal principles in his resurrection and majestic ascension. Only the 
Jews, of pure white "Adamic blood, did Christ call into his company. 
Only Jews did he authorize to preach his gospel. Only Jews were 
commanded to preach the gospel “among all nations” after his as¬ 
cension and the baptism of the Spirit, which only Jews could re¬ 
ceive, until after the Great Pentecost, after which the “Gentiles” 
could “come in.” It was not until after the plan of salvation, be¬ 
ginning with Adam, and confined to his race down through the ages 
to Jesus Christ the Second Adam, was completed, and committed to 
the GREAT RACE SEGREGATIONIST committed his gospel to 
“every creature” of “all nations.” Born of the segregated white 
stock of Adam, circumcised a s the “seed of Abraham,” Jesus was 
loyal to his race and to his State; and while his infinite love for all 
races freely offered his blood for the redemption of all, he would 
not prostitute the dignity of his race nor hi s nation to the standard 

(44) 


of racial equality, nor found his Kingdom on that principle. Cer- 
tamiy Christ was the world’s greatest race segregationist, and 
founded Christianity, m its physical and social aspects on that prin- 
ciple. And since God the Father commanded the territorial separ¬ 
ation of races, and Jesus Christ his son exemplified it in a life of 
holiness and sacrificial love to all races, we can not escape the con¬ 
clusion that the territorial separation 0 f races is founded in Divinity 
and is necessary for the best interests of each race, and a benefic¬ 
ent provision for all. It must therefore be necessary that the 
Kingdom of Christ should be founded in that principle, both spirit¬ 
ually and socially. Certainly God has held himself aloof from the 
colored races as to inspiration and incarnation, and has refrained 
from trusting the!colored races with . leadership in'Christianity and 
higher civilization; and should the white race retreat from the high 
position assigned it of supremacy, and thus forego the precepts and 
examples of Divinity? 

WHITE RACE CALLED IN ABRAHAM 

God's call to Abraham was a call to the entire white race. It 
was not designed to divide the white race but to unite it in one 
Universal Brotherhood. For this purpose the law of circumcision, 
the bond of white race unity was open to all white tribes. Circum¬ 
cision was the sign of national faith in God as well as the bond of 
white race purity and unity. It is an important fact that Abraham 
had this faith in God, and bore his identity with the pure white 
stock of Adam through the line of Noah and Seth, before he receiv¬ 
ed the law of circumcision. 

“And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the right¬ 
eousness of the faith which he had, yet being uncircumcised: that 
he might be the father of all them that believe, though they be not 
circumcised, that righteousness might be imputed to them also; and 
the father of circumcision to them who are not of the circumcision 
only, but who also walk in the steps of that faith of our father Ab¬ 
raham, which he had, being yet uncircumcised.” For the promise 
that^he should,be the Heir of the World was. not to Abraham, or to 
his seed, through the law, but through the righteousness of faith. 
(Rom. 4:11-13.) We note in this important passage that the in¬ 
heritance in question is not the spiritual heaven, but the “WORLD” 
the earthly possession and “dominion” of the “elect race”; and that 
it is given to faith in the doctrines, policies and promises of God* 
just as eternal life is given to faith in Jesus Christ as the Son of 
God; and that in this call to Abraham, the believers in the divine 
policies of God, as entrusted to Adam and to Noah, were included 
in this work of Racial Election. Therefore the lineage of Jesus 
Christ who was the supreme object of racial election, extends from 
Joseph the husband of Mary to Adam the son and the image of 
God, embracing the virtuous elements of the white race proper, to 
the exclusion of the colored races. (Luke 3:23-28.) 

(45) . 


As the supreme duty of universal “dominion” was laid upon 
the white race in God’s command to Adam (Gen. 1:27,28) and to 
Noah, (Gen. 9:1,2) so the call to Abraham to maintain white race 
unity and supremacy embraces the white race proper. 

WHITE LINE REACHES THE THRONE OF GOD 
It is a sublime vision of the enlightened soul that gets a clear 
view of the great white line, extending from Eden to Calvary, and 
from Calvary to the throne of God. From Adam to Jesus, this 
“Highway,” upon which the “unclean” and the “ravenous beast” 
could not enter, (Is. 35:8-10) has been thronged with patriarchs 
and prophets, and unbroken succession of the race bearing the in¬ 
signia of God’s own likeness, until the “promised seed” came, the 
Son of Man, casting a halo of glory upon the “elect lineage” and 
upon the divine policies of race standardization which held the 
“precious blood” in its foreordained channel, until it poured from 
Adamic veins from the cross of Calvary. In his Adamic body of 
flesh the “precious Elect” made the supreme sacrifice for all races: 
in this body He rose from the dead: in this body He gave the com¬ 
mand to evangelize all nations: in this body He ascended to the 
right hand of the throne of God, and in this body He shall return 
and judge all nations and alll races. (Ac. 1:7-11; Matt. 25:31-46.) 

RACE SEGREGATION FRIENDLY POLICY 
The provision that each distinct race should own its pro rata 
share of the earth, and occupy its own territory, and live under its 
own laws, is the purest edict of justice. It lays the basis of friend¬ 
ship between races. It is when the different races commingle as 
neighbors and citizens of the same State that RACE CONSCIENCE 
asserts itself in race hatred and violence; and when the more de¬ 
graded elements of the races assume relations as “brute beasts,” 
and artificial races are produced, and race standards are broken 
down. The whole tenor of Bible teaching, from Genesis to Revela¬ 
tions, is in favor of the territorial segregation of races, and the 
race unity of nations, and against racial equality, and against mis¬ 
cegenation . 

SIGNIFICANCE OF CIRCUMCISION 

Circumcision was the greatest law God ever commanded. It 
involved faith in God, and the keeping of every other law of God 
given to men. It was the law of foreordination and predestina¬ 
tion: the law of the race unity of nations: the “sign” of white race 
purity: the type of the new birth 0 f the Spirit, with its chief object 
the birth and redemption work of Jesus Christ. This is the sublime 
significance of CARNAL CIRCUMCISION. (Rom. 4:11; Gal. 5:3.) 
It was the “sign” by which the elect race came to be known; the 
sign by which the babe of Bethlehem should be identified as the 
“promised seed,” the God-man in whom fore ordination and predes¬ 
tination should reveal all the blessings of a free salvation Having 

(46) - - - * 


reached the oibject of its prophecy in the person of Jesus, it had 
served its purpose: and with all the symbolic ordinances and laws 
which prophesied of his birth, Christ took it out of the way of all 
Christian believers, “nailing it to his cross/’ (Col. 2:14.) Carnal 
circumcision then gave place to its antetype, the circumcision of the 
Spirit. (Col. 2:11.) 

ALL CHRISTIANS JEWS INWARDLY 

“For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly, neither is that 
circumcision which is outward in the flesh: but he is a Jew which is 
one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit.” 
(Rom. 2:28, 29.) The members of the Jewish church who believed 
on Christ, who signified their faith by submitting to the gospel law 
of baptism, constituted the first Christian church at Jerusalem, 
from whence Christianity spread among the nations. Into this re¬ 
generate stock of Jews, as the “tame olive tree,” the Gentiles were, 
as branches of the “wild olive tree, graffed in,” by the circumcision 
of the Spirit and so became “Jews inwardly.” (Rom. 11:7-24.) The 
Gentile churches of Christ have their root and nourishment in the 
spiritual Jews that accepted Christ, and their life and headship in 
Jesus who was a Jew physically, nationally, politically, morally, so¬ 
cially and spiritually .The present day church of God is the ancient 
Jewish church recreated, regenerated, and conformed to the Spirit 
and teachings of Jesus. The present day Christianity is the deeper 
significance and more perfect revelation of the ancient Jewish 
Theoracy. We are the beneficiaries of this broader and clearer 
light which “blinded” the skeptical element of the Jews and which 
worked their dispersion. We are therefore the more fearfully re¬ 
sponsible to God for our use and dissemination of this greater reve¬ 
lation . 

CHRISTIANITY OPPOSED TO RACIAL EQUALITY 

We have the evidence, of the most positive character, that the 
founder of Christianity was a pronounced race segregationist; that 
he founded his “Kingdom of Righteousness and Peace” on the policy 
and in the spirit of the social separation of races. That the object 
of carnal circumcision, which was the territorial separation of races 
should not fail, Christ made the “circumcision of the heart” of 
Christian believers the infallible work of the Holy Spirit in regen¬ 
eration, that enlightened Christian conscience should revolt at the 
commingling of races, whether socially or religiously. That any re¬ 
ligious teacher should denounce those churches and ministers, which 
observe the race color line in church assemblage, a s “ignorant, nar¬ 
row, and egotistic” is evidence of the lack of a competent knowl¬ 
edge of the BIBLE, and of the LOFTY CHARACTER and 
racial dignity of Jesus, on the part of such negropholistic teachers. 
The Spirit of Christianity is not the spirit of racial equality. 
Neither is the spirit of racial equality the Spirit of Christ, who ob- 
(47) 


served the segregation of races territorially, socially and religiously. 
For Christ to command his ministers to preach his gospel to every 
creature of all nations was quite a different thing from commanding 
the commingling of races or declaring racial equality or condemn¬ 
ing the territorial segregation of races, which he had strictly ob¬ 
served . The division of the Negroes and Caucasians of America 
into separate congregations for the worship of God, is the prompt¬ 
ings of the workings of the Holy Spirit in circumcision of the heart 
of the believers of both races. 

NEGROES WISER THAN THEIR WHITE TEACHERS 

There is a class of Negro ministers and laymen who have ad¬ 
vanced beyond the intelligence and racial dignity of their would be 
white teachers, and stand for the social segregation of races: and 
not a few of the more intelligent class of Negroes advocate the ter¬ 
ritorial segregation of races, and desire their race nationalized on 
their God-given continent of Africa. There is in each distinct race, 
a God-given race conscience, which revolts at social intimacy with 
other races. This race conscience is the natural intuition or “en¬ 
mity” which God created between the races to militate against their 
a filiation, for the maintenance of race standardization. (Gen. 3:15.) 
The crcumcision of the spirit, so far from destroying this natural 
rare conscience, quickens it in the Christian believer, of whatever 
race, and creates an intuition in each race to recognize the other 
races as “unclean” so fas as social touch and intermarriage are 
concerned. So far as the plan of redemption is concerned, the 
“middle wall of partition” between races was razed by the death of 
Christ, (Col. 2:11-18) and in the opening of the fountain of the 
precious blood, no race was excluded from its benefits as “common 
or unclean.” (Ac. 10:9-28, 34-48.) But for all races to have access 
to one common fountain of cleansing from sin is quite a different 
matter from their having access to 0 ne common ballot box, a nd to 
one common marriage altar, as if they were of “one flesh.” 

NATIONAL EVANGELIZATION 

“And it shall come to pass, if thou shalt hearken dilligentlfy 
unto the voice of the Lord thy God to observe and to do all his com¬ 
mandments which I command the e this day: that the Lord thy God 
will set thee on high above all nations of the earth: and ail 
these blessings shall come on thee and overtake thee, if thou shalt 
hearken unto the voice of the Lord thy God.” Blessed shalt thou 
be in the city, and blessed shalt thou be in the field.” Blessed shall 
be the fruit of thy body, and the fruit of thy ground, and the fruit 
of thy cattle, the increase of thy kine, and the flocks of thy sheen 
Blessed shall be thy basket and thy store. Blessed shalt thou be when 
thou oomest in, and blessed shaft thou be when thou goest out. 
The Lord shall cause thine enemies that rise up against thee to be 
smitten before thy face.” (Deut. 28:1-7.) 

(48) 


These passages relate to the “great nation” which God made 
of Abraham, domiciled on its own territory, under its own laws. Its 
policies were territorial segregation of races; race unity of the fam¬ 
ily and the nation, and a standardized system of agriculture and of 
commerce, with a great temple at the national capital for the public 
worship of God under a unified system of revealed religion. All its 
international transactions were performed in the name of God, 
whether measures of peace or of war. As a nation living up to the 
standard set by the order of God, its national blessings were (1) 
Superiority to other nations in power and influence. (2) Prosperity 
4 'in the cities and in the field,” that is both the city people and the 
country people alike prosperous. (3) Hale and happy children, as 
the “fruit of the body” well governed. (4) Invincible in war. A 
nation of virtuous, intelligent citizens under a government so well 
balanced racially, morally, economically, and spiritually has within 
its civic organism all the essential elements of purity, power, pros¬ 
perity and contentment, which cements its union and renders it im¬ 
pregnable to a foreign foe. Such wag Palestine during the 450 
years 0 f its democracy under judges. To maintain its national 
standard of morals capital punishment wa promptly meted out to 
miscegenists, rapists, blasphemers, fornicators, and murderers. 
Thefts and frauds were punished with fourfold restitution. The 
citizens were of the better class, educated in the languages, the 
sciences, and the arts. (Dan. 1:3,4.) A general national religious 
revival was held at the national capital once each year, and a yearly 
pentecost of thanksgiving to God for his gift of the Law which gave 
them national existence and excellent distinction and prosperity 
and peace temporally and spiritually. Thus the State of Palestine 
a nation of God’s own make through Abraham and descendants, 
was made the pattern for the formation, reformation and govern¬ 
ment of nations, a pattern by which Abraham should become a 
-‘father of many nations” and a “blessing to all the families” or 
races “of the earth.” This pure and powerful State was designed 
to be an evangelizing power to other nations. 

“Rejoice, O ye nations, with his people.” (Deut. 32:43.) 

“And thou shalt swear, the Lord liveth, in truth, in judgment, 
and in righteousness; and the nations shall bless themselves in him, 

and in him shall they glory.” (Jer. 4:2.) 

“Sing and rejoice, 0 daughter of Zion: for lo, I come, and I 
will dwell in the midst of thee, saith the Lord.” “And many nations 
shall be joined by the Lord in that day, and shall be my people.” 
(Zech. 2:10, 11.) 

“Thus saith the Lord of hosts; It shall yet come to pass, that 
there shall come people, and the inhabitants of many cities: and the 
inhabitants of one city shall go to another saying, Let us go speedily 
to pray before the Lord, and to seek the Lord of hosts: I will go 

(49) 


also.” Yea, many people and strong nations shall come to seek the 
Xord of hosts in Jerusalem, and to pray before the Lord.” Thus 
saith the Lord of hosts: In those days it shall come to pass that ten 
"men shall take hold, out of all languages of the nations, even shall 
‘take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying, we will go with 
you: for we have heard that God is with you.” (Zech. 8:20-23.) The 
-.splendid laws, the prosperous administration of government, the 
prompt punishment of crime, the morality and deep piety of Israel, 
and the prosperity of his people gave powerful advertisement of the 
power and goodness of God among the other nations. Its evangel¬ 
izing power went with the news of the nation. 

LAWS WHICH CHRIST ABOLISHED 

The laws which Christ in his death, abolished, were only those 
•which typified his birth and his death. It was only carnal forms 
which he abolished. He did not abolish the spirit and principles 
enunciated in these symbolic ordinances. The principles of truth 
and righteousness are eternal. They canot be abolished. If the 
righteousness of a nation, in the days of Moses, had an evangelizing 
power over wicked nations under the Jewish dispensation, the right¬ 
eousness of a nation today, under the Christian dispensation, must 
have a like power over the heathen nations of today. The Scrip¬ 
tures furnish abundant evidence, on the other hand, that when the 
Hebrew nation broke down its national standards, fell into misce¬ 
genation, idolatry, and oppression to its common citizens, it not on¬ 
ly lost its national power, but its national existence, which nothing 
•could restore except the restoration of its former national stand¬ 
ards. 

I would not disparage the itenerary system of evangelization: 
Tor Christ established it by both precept and example. But figura¬ 
tively speaking, the missionaries are the small arms, and national 
evengalism the heavy ordinance. Both are necessary for Christian¬ 
izing heathen nations. When the nation from whence comes the 
missionary is characterized by race amalgamation, legalized lechery, 
economic oppression, political division and strife, a divided and 
•competetive system of religion, bribed courts, wholesale single hand 
murder, and white slavery, as is America, the heathen will ever de¬ 
mand of the missionary, “Heal your own nation, then you may heal 
•ours.” No honest, competent preacher, of this land, will undertake 
‘to state that America is as a nation, prepared politically, morally, 
socially or spiritually to Christianize the heathen countries nation¬ 
ally. 

WHEN A NATION IS CHRISTIANIZED 

The Marriage law; the Sabbatic law; the Territorial Race Seg¬ 
regation law; the law of Agricultural and Commercial Standardiza¬ 
tion; the Justice of Courts, and a Uniform system of Divine Relig¬ 
ion; the Liberty of the citizens; and National union, are divine 
policies, in harmony with natural law, and are the God-given essen- 

(50) 


tial elements of a Christian nation. Where either of these elements 
are absent there is no Christian nation. A part of the system is; 
not equal to the whole. In violating one of these divine laws the' 
nation becomes “ guilty of all.” Every Bible scholar knows that: 
these eight chief properties of the great Hebrew commonwealth 
characterized the “Great Nation” which God made of the “one 1 ®* 
Adamic blood” of Abraham, the pattern for all nations that would! 
t wa -lk in the faithful steps of Abraham,” and thus secure the’ 
blessings” of a pure, scientific government, divinely calculated for' 
the physical, mental, moral, social and spiriual development of the? 
citizens. These elements of national life are the eternal principles- 
of right, whether under the system of Judaism or of Christianity.. 
Like the great God from whom they are given to men, they are 
holy, eternal, and unchangeable. They are the essential principles 
of civic righteousness, the only power and influence that can create 
national and world environment and a moral atmosphere favorable 
to the spread and triumph of true Christianity. 

RELATION OF CHURCH AND STATE 

Let me not be misunderstood to hold or teach the unity or the 
immutability of Church and State. The being of the one is not 
essential to the being of the other. They are separate institutions. 
Christ was rmf. founding a political empire, nor republic, when he? 
“set up” his “Kingdom of Heaven,” which “is not of this world*® 
physically or politically. All Christendom knows that the once 
splendid government of Palestine had been corrupted and subjugat¬ 
ed to the idolatrous Roman government, when John the Baptist 
ushered in the gospel era, and Christ called out his church and set up 
the Kingdom of God. Every Sunday school student knows that 
between the church of Christ and the Roman Government under 
which it was “set up,” there was neither unity, union, nor the- 
slightest degree of affinity. The church furnished no officers for 
the State, and the State furnished no officers for the church. This 
absolute separation of Church and State continued until A.D. 325* 
when under the church leadership of Sylvester pastor of the church 
at Alexandria, Egypt; and under the State leadership of Constan¬ 
tine the Great the emperor of the Roman Empire, Church and State 
were united. This unison of Church and State was effected by the 
installment of Slyvester pope, or vicar of God, under sanction of 
Constantine the king. This action of Church and State in joint 
co-operation was preceded by the joint adoption of the Nicene 1 
Creed by both Church and State, pursuant to which was the mem¬ 
orable act which united Church and State, and which gave existence 
and distinction to the present day Roman Catholic Church, which 
had its birth at Nice, Asia Minor, in A.D. 325. The terms of the 
union provided “no pope no church; no pope no king; no king no- 
pope ” It is not to be wondered at that the learned and pious pas— 

(51) 


tor Leo, of Western Rome, led a minority of both ministers and 
laymen to stand aloof from this new union of Church and State, 
when we search the entire New Testament, and all history, sacred 
and profane, ALL IN VAIN, for one iota of authentic proof of a 
pope of the church, in the person of “St. Peter,” or any one else, 
during: the first three centuries of the Christian era. There can be 
no question that prior to the crucifixion of Christ, some of his apos¬ 
tles aspired to headship over the church, that is to say, to papal 
power, but Christ rebuked this ambition as sensual and heterogen¬ 
eous to the principles upon which he had established his Kingdom. 
As head of the church, Christ judged this ambition for headship in 
his Kingdom as treason against his divine majesty, and rebuked it 
in the following strong terms. v 

“And there was also a strife among them which of them should 
be accounted the greatest. And he (Christ) said unto them, The 
kings of the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; and they that 
exercise authority upon them are called benefactors.” But ye shall 
not be so.” (Luke 22:24-26.) 

This last rebuke of Christ upon this unholy ambition for hier¬ 
archy in his church thoroughly converted Peter and the other apos¬ 
tles to the democratic principles of his Kingdom. So far from the 
apostle Peter exercising the power of functions of pope, he preach¬ 
ed the doctrine of church democracy, the liberty of both the minis¬ 
try and the laity. To the pastors he exhorts. “The elders which 
are among you, I exhort, who am also an elder, and a witness of the 
sufferings of Christ, and also a partaker of the glory that shall be 
revealed: feed the flock of God which is among you, taking the 
oversight thereof, not by constraint, but willingly; not for filthy 
lucre, but of a ready mind; neither as being lords over God's heri¬ 
tage,but being ensamples to the flock.” (I. Peter 5:1-3.) 

To the laity he exhorts, “As free, and not using your liberty 
for a cloak of maliciousness, but as the servants of God.” (I. Peter 
2:16.) Here the apostle declares himself ; on an equality with 11 
other elders of the churches, and stresses "the fact that none had the 
authority of rulership over the churches, and warns the members 
against the abuse of their liberty. The apostle wrote these words 
in synonymous terms with the Lord’s rebuke upon his pre-passion 
desire for that lordship in the church he now disclaims for all 
church officials, and in the identical spirit recommended in Christ’s 
gracious rebuke, the spirit of ministerial service, and not in the 
spirit of ministerial or official lordship. It was in the full light and 
spirit of the pure democracy of Christianity that the “apostle of the 
Gentiles” gives us the sublime graphic picture of the Kingdom of 
Christ in the rich phraseology, “Where the Spirit of the Lord is 
there is LIBERTY.” (II. Cor. 3:17.) A body thus instituted with 
the full rights of autonomy, is necessarily complete wnhii itself 

(52) 


and is separate from all other institutions. The conservative min¬ 
ority. which, under the leadership of Leo, refused submission to the 
lordship of Sylvester, was acting in the spirit of the doctrine of “St.. 
Peter, ’ whose ashes and memory were then being pressed into ser— 
vir»p as “First Pope ,, of the church, in open violation of the demo¬ 
cratic principles which Christ, the only rightful head of the church*, 
enunciated in hi s veto upon ecclesiastic headships of men. This* 
minority kept the doctrine of Separation of Church and State be¬ 
fore the world for twelve centuries, when, through the enlightened' 
zeal and courage of Luther, Calvin, Zwingle and Melangthon; and 5 
king Henry the Eighth, it became the dynamic force that shattered 
the power that had strove, with torch and stake to annihilate its ad¬ 
vocates . 

If the Baptists maintain an unbroken line of living advocates 
of the doctrine of the Separation of Church and State, and of 
Church Democracy, and a pure evangelical Christianity, from the 
present to the call of the apostles and disciples at the shores of 
Galilee, which their opponents have never been able to disprove, 
they are identified with Leo and the brave minority which stood 
with him in that trying peril, which forms one of the most import¬ 
ant epochs in the world’s history. This minority, known in differ¬ 
ent, centuries by different names, as Waldenses, Paulicians, etc., 
and in the days of Martin Luther’s Reformation, as Anabaptists, 
and at present as Baptists, gave the incentive to Luther, Melang— 
thon, Zwingle, and others of the reformers to that reformation 
which reestablished, in all Protestant countries, the separation of 
Church and State; and political freedom of conscience in matters of 
religion: for, in all ages and countries, from the gift of the Spirit 
at Jerusalem to the ratification of the American Constitution, the 
Bapists had stood for these principles: and certainly it was upon 
Baptist principles that the reformers acted in protesting against the 
doctrines and practices of Roman Catholicism, Exactly to the ex¬ 
tent that the reformers disagreed with the Catholics they agreed* 
with the Baptists: and to the extent that they retained the doctrines 
and practices of Catholics they disagreed with the Baptists. Yet the 
fact remains that had there been no Baptists the reformation and 
the American Republic might have never been. Through the same 
spirit of Church Democracy that reestablished the Separation of 
Church and State, the American Republic was founded on the prin^ 
ciple of political democracy, and the proper relation bewteen Church 
and State established in America. We come now to the acute ques¬ 
tion, What is the proper relation between the church and the State? 
I answer, it is the relation of voluntary co-operation. The State, to 
;be favorable to Christianity, must suppress every custom and prac¬ 
tice that creates environments and sentiments contrary to the spirit 
and principles of Christianity; must protect the worship of God 

( 53 ) 


against molestation, and maintain a regime favorable to the physi¬ 
cal, moral, mental and social development of its individual citizens. 
It must, in order to thus elevate its citizens, be founded upon the 
moral laws of God as revealed in the (Bible. The relation the 
Church should sustain to the State, is the close study of its political 
policies, as to whether they are the Bible principles of government, 
maintaining the ends of justice and liberty, and the general promo¬ 
tion of civic righteousness, creating a fertile field for the growth 
and reign of pure Christianity. Against the defects in government 
legislative, and executive, the Church should protest through 
press and pulpit, with petition and ballot. This is the manner in 
which the Baptists of Virginia whipped the clause into the Ameri¬ 
can Constitution providing for religious liberty. Not only should 
the church criticise, destructively, defects in government, it should 
offer remedial and supplementary laws meeting the needs of the 
people. 

GOD'S INTEREST IN GOVERNMENT 

In every age of the world, from its foundation to the close of 
the age of direct divine revelation, God has expressed his will and 
preference in human governments. From the writing of the Penta¬ 
teuch by Moses to the close of the Apocalypse by the ‘‘beloved 
apostle," God expresses his concern in politics. And why not, since 
next to the plan of salvation, government most vitally affects man¬ 
kind? God seeks the temporal good of man through government 
with the same fatherly care that he seeks the spiritual good of men 
through the plan of redemption. One of the purposes of the King¬ 
dom which Christ “set up" is the destruction of monarchy and of 
bad governments generally. (Dan. 2:44.) When Israel desired a 
king, a monarchy instead of democracy, God entered a protest 
against the political change. (I. Sam. 8:4-19.) 

CHRIST’S KINGDOM NOT A MONARCHY 

The Greek word BALILEA, rendered “kingdom," in the Mew 
Testament, signifies government. It does not necessarily imply 
monarchy. The word may be correctly translated by the terms 
government, or republic. The phrases Government of Heaven, or 
Republic of Heaven, would be more clearly suggestive of the prin¬ 
ciples of the “gospel of the Kingdom" than the phrase “Kingdom of 
Heaven." Christ governs by consent of the governed. He saves 
those only who are willing to be saved. His call to the world is 
thus—“If any man will be my disciple let him take up his cross and 
follow me." To his disciples he appeals, “If ye love me keep my 
commandments." Thus Christ, the Governor, makes freedom of 
will, and constancy in affection, the principles of citizenship in his 
“Kingdom of Heaven." His government is therefore a pure democ¬ 
racy, not a monarchy nor a despotism. It must therefore be intol¬ 
erant to ecclesiastical heirarchy. Hence the cornerstone of “the 
church, which is the pillar and ground of the truth" of the “gospel 

(54) 


of the Kingdom of God,” bears this sublime inscription: “Where the 
Spirit of the Lord is there is LIBERTY.” (II. Cor. 3:17.) Hierarchy 
in the Church, is in direct opposition to the policies of Christ's 
Kingdom of Heaven,” designed for the government of the free 
born children of God; and tends to militate against political democ¬ 
racy in civil government. If the children of God, the wisest and 
best class of men, are to be declared incapable of self government 
under divine law in the Church, how may the unregenerate be con¬ 
sidered capable of self government as citizens of the State? I think 
Baptists have, as citizens of the Kingdom of God, proved themselves 
capable of self-government under the Law of Christ, and therefore 
apt teachers and exemplars of that democracy that should reign in 
the State and the nation; and on the door, and over every pulpit of 
every Baptist church on the globe, there should be written in letters 
of Gold, “Where the Spirit of the Lord is there is Liberty.” Liberty 
in the church and in the State is Baptist Democracy. This we must 
teach, and for its triumph we must labor until it covers the earth. 

PAUL’S POLITICAL PRAYER 

“I exhort therefor, first of all, that supplications, prayers, in¬ 
tercessions, thanksgivings, be made for all men; for kings and all 
that are in authority, that we may lead a tranquil life in godliness 
and honesty: for this is good and acceptable to God our Saviour, 
who wills that all men should be saved, and come to the knowledge 
of the truth.” (I. Tim. 2:1-4.) 

Analysis of these passages shows: (1) That such “prayer” and 
“thanksgiving” should have “FIRST” place in the churches. (2) 
That the goal sought is good civil government, in which the citizens 
are characterized by their godliness, honesty and contentment. (3) 
That God has joy in such a government, and desires thanks for such 
splendid administration. (4) That more people will come to gospel 
truth and be saved under good government. (5) That a defacto 
Christian nation is necessary for world evangelization. (6) That un¬ 
iversal democracy and clean government is necessary to bring “all 
men” to a saving knowledge of the gospel. God desires that Bap¬ 
tists pit themselves against every national evil, and for political re¬ 
generation and the reign of civic righteousness. Bad government 
and corrupt national customs militate against the light, purity ana' 
progress of Christianity, and against Baptist principles, the princi¬ 
ples of the Kingdom of God. Paul’s Political Prayer expresses 
God’s interest in good government. It summons the Baptists to 
prayer, to the petition and to the ballot box, as good citizens, to 
swat the evils that obstruct Christianity. For every bad law we 
should mourn at the feet of God and for every anti-Christian cus¬ 
tom. For every good law and institution we should publicly give 
thanks to God. Our government officials should know that our eyes 
are upon them: that we have them in remembrance at the throne 0 f 
God. Let Baptists lead and the other religious bodies will co-oper- 
at with us. (55) 


EVILS THAT DESTROY AMERICA 

The evils that have driven peace from America are (1) RACE 
EVIL. For the solution of this problem the True American League 
recommends the race policies of Thomas Jefferson, the founder of 
the Democratic party; and of Abraham Lincoln, the “Father of the 
Republican Party.” Their policy was the nationalization of the 
Negroes of America on their native soil of Africa. 

PLANS FOR BAPTISTS TO SOLVE NEGRO PROBLEM 

(1) Let Baptists take up the work of securing the Congo 
Free State, or other suitable African territory for the Negroes of 
the world, that this race may no longer be “without a nation or a 
flag.” Belgium might be induced to sell her possessions in Africa 
for a reasonable sum. Its sale might aid Belgium in paying her 
war debt, and thus prove helpful to that war torn people, the salva¬ 
tion of the black race, and aid America in solving her most perplex¬ 
ing national problem. The project promises enough to justify ser¬ 
ious consideration by Baptists. If a part of the SEVENTY-FIVE 
MILLIONS could be used for the purchase of territory for the race 
It could be put to no better use. Certainly the other denominations 
would do their part in so important an enterprise, and the “outside 
world 0 would largely donate to this laudable cause. 

(2) Let Baptists push the work of organizing local lodges of 
the True American League of the White Brotherhood of the World, 
that the organized citizens may cooperate in working out a solution 
of the American race problem on Christian principles; and in secur¬ 
ing the cooperation of the American Government in nationalizing 
the Negroes of America on their own soil, as domiciled citizens, 
under their own flag and government. 

PLANS FOR SOLVING NEGRO PROBLEM 

The tentative plans for colonizing the Negroes of America, 
which the True American League proposes are as follows: (1) Secure 
suitable territory in Africa, sufficient for the future needs of the 
black race of the world, that this race may have its pro rata share 
of the earth: this accomplished, then repeal the Fourteenth and 
Fifteenth Amendment to our Federal Constitution. (2) Let our 
Federal Government take up the work of transporting the Negroes 
to their own country, under protection of the American Flag: the 
Negroes most anxious to return to their native land to be taken 
first: the transportation to proceed as fast only as may be consist¬ 
ent with the interests of both races, so gradual as to give time for 
readjustment. (3) The American Government to transport the 
Negroes at its own expense, a nd to render ample assistance to the 
new black republic thus formed until it becomes self-supporting: 
and to secure international agreement for its protection in all its 
rights, forever. (4) The Government to purchase, at fair valua¬ 
tion, all lands owned by negroes in America: the same to be sold 

(56) 


to homeless white persons, at small profit, on reasonable time for 
payment, at low rates of interest. (5) Foreign immigration to 
the United States restricted to healthy, intelligent members of the 
white race, and to such numbers annually only as may find profit¬ 
able occupation. 

Upon these plans we think the colonization of the Negroes of 
America is a practical proposition. We now cordially invite our 
Baptist brethren and the world to consider the True American de¬ 
claration of the rights of races. 

DECLARATION OF RIGHTS OF RACES 

(1) All races are endowed by the Great Creator with equal 
rights to live; and to follow the rightful pursuits of happiness, each 
race in its own chosen way, according to its own ideal, on its own 
soil, under its own government, and to 0 wn its pro rata share of the 
earth, and are entitled to equal privileges and protection in travel 
on land and sea; in commerce; in sojourn; in international repre¬ 
sentation; to equal respect to their national flags; to equal privi¬ 
leges in teaching science, art and religion, and in all the advantages 
of international relations, including each race of every color, re¬ 
gardless of any condition of previous servitude. 

(2) True Americans favor a White Brotherhood of the World, 
safeguarding the racial interests of the entire Caucasian race of 
every part of the globe, standing for world democracy, and for per¬ 
manent peace, on the principle of the race unity of nations, effected 
through the universal territorial segregation of races; and a similar 
brotherhood of the colored races, separating the different races into 
segregated brotherhoods, each standing for the principles enunciat¬ 
ed in the American Declaration of the Rights of Races, and for 
world democracy and for permanent peace and for the territorial 
segregation of races; these brotherhoods to be effected by friendly 
agreement; America taking the initial steps. 

(3) America owes the ex-slave of this nation the debt of se¬ 
curing for the Negro race of the world, ample and suitable territory 
in Africa, and to render adequate assistance and protection to all 
Negroes of America who desire to migrate to their native land; and 
this obligation extends to the white nations of Europe which have* 
in any age, participated in the Negro slave trade. 

This i s the declaration which the True American League, from 
its national headquarters at Eufaula, Okla., petitioned President 
Wilson to read at the opening of the World Peace Conference. I 
leave it to an honest world to judge and to speak as to whether this 
was not a fit declaration to come from America to that conference. 
It was at a time when every interest suggested in this declaration 
was up for readjustment. The Yellow race was scrambling for a 
foothold in America and clamoring for a provision in the Constitu¬ 
tion of the League of Nations for universal racial equality. The 

(57) 


Coast States of America were struggling against this “yellow peril.” 
The Negroes of America, “without a nation or a flag,” were nobly 
doing their part on the bloody fields of France, while their own 
Africa was being divided between the other races leaving the black 
race without the possibilities of an adequate national territory, 
dooming it to a subordinate relation with the white man, at best a 
condition of semi-slavery. The True American Declaration of the 
Rights of Races suggested the only proper basis for an equitable 
readjustment of territory; the restoration of lost rights to the weak, 
er races and nations; for world democracy, and for permanent 
peace; and the ground principles of a desirable, democratic, bene¬ 
ficial league of nations. This is the declaration which I have, from 
the beginning, insisted should be the text of the League of Nations. 

WHITE BROTHERHOOD 

Every peculiar interest of the Caucasian race, including its 
high mission in religion, in science, art, invention and higher civil¬ 
ization, all of which is impossible of duplication in any other race, 
demands a universal organization of the entire Caucasian family 
into ONE UNIVERSAL WHITE BROTHERHOOD, standing for the 
RACE UNITY OF NATIONS on the plan of the TERRITORIAL 
SEGREGATION OF RACES, as the only natural foundation for 
WORLD DEMOCRACY and PERMANENT PEACE. 

LEAGUE OF NATIONS 

The separate brotherhoods of races would follow a universal 
white brotherhood. TheNegro race would imitate the white race, 
of course, and a yellow brotherhood would follow. These three 
brotherhoods, standing for a just division of the earth between the 
races: for the universal right of the minority race of every State 
to migrate to its allotted territory; for world democracy and for 
permanent peace under the foregoing regulations, and for world 
disarmament, would lay a natural and sure foundation for a league 
of nations to safeguard the principles and provisions of the separ¬ 
ate brotherhoods. The brotherhoods would incite world study of 
the distinction of races. It would lead to higher enlightenment in 
ethnology, and remove the cause of race prejudice. It would place 
each race in position to know itself and its possibilities as a race. 
It would reveal the “divine” image” in the Caucasian family and its 
fitness for “dominion,” and bind the white nations of the world un¬ 
der moral Obligation to maintain their racial identity and interests, 
in that fraternal spirit and dignified manner becoming to the pecul¬ 
iar race in the “image of God,” which has stood alone in the world’s 
progress and in the uplift of the colored races. Notwithstanding 
the Peace Conference furnished a perfect opportunity of the most 
auspicious character for the introduction of this proposition, and 
the fitness of the proposition to world conditions, I see no reason 
why it may not yet be presented to the world, and worked 

(58) 


out 


through the League of Nations, should the league become a tangi¬ 
ble reality, and in a peace time world conference. 

I am conscious of the enormity of the proposition, that after 
the proposed brotherhoods had their nucleus, and the land divisions 
agreed upon, including unoccupied territory, it would require time 
for the consummation; and that the migration period might cover 
half a century, I am no less conscious of the greater enormity and 
the moral impossibility of establishing either world democracy or 
permanent peace while present world racial conditions, and territory 
grabbing, and oppression of the weaker by the stronger continue. 
My clear and deep convictions of the rightness of the proposition, 
its perfect harmony with nature and the purposes of Almighty God 
inspire me with confidence in its acceptance by the races and in the 
possibility of its ultimate accomplishment. As to the justice of the' 
proposition and the satisfactory conditions that would prevail under 
such world regulations, no one questions. The question is its prac¬ 
ticability. But this lack of moral courage and of confidence in hu ¬ 
manity is due to a lack of common sense consideration of the enor¬ 
mity and impracticability of extending democracy and the reign of 
permanent peace over a world of mongrelism, land-grabbing, injus¬ 
tice, profiteering and oppression of the weaker by the stronger. 

AMERICA A PLAIN EXAMPLE 

The Republican party undertook to democratize America and 
to maintain national peace by attempting to eradicate race distinc¬ 
tion by legislation and social recognition, and without provision of 
anv natural and effectual measures to prevent the oppression of the 
weaker by the stronger, in labor or in commerce, either as a pro¬ 
tection to the Negro or to the weaker classes of white citizens. The 
results have proved the enormity and impracticability of the pro¬ 
ject- One of the first results was the war between the States, in 
which the “Grand Old Party” slew its own white kin to exalt the 
Negro to an equal standing with itself, politically and socially, and 
the Great White Party slew its white neighbors to maintain race 
distinction and white supremacy in America. It was all about the 
African that Anglo-Saxon slew Anglo-Saxon of which the “amend¬ 
ments” are sad and embarrassing reminders. It was all due to the 
enormous, impracticable attempt to establish democracy and peace 
without race unity of the nation, and on the principle of race mon¬ 
grelism. The results are an ill-paid, degraded labor system due to 
“cheap nigger labor”; a non progressive, haphazard, thriftless farm¬ 
ing system, due to incompetency in the participants and bad market 
conditions; vicious race prejudice; political corruption and strife, 
strained relations between the white citizens of the South and the 
North- increasing moral and social corruption and criminality; race 
riots and Negro uprisings; the Negroes disfranchised and excluded 
from white society in some of the States and voting and marrying 
(59) 


white people in others, and in all States arrogant, restless and crim¬ 
inal; the race standard of America reduced to mongrelism and the 
national capital thronged with Negroes. If any fact can be demon¬ 
strated the Republican party has, by fifty years trial, demonstrated 
the enormity and impracticability of the project of establishing 
democracy and peace in or between mongrel States . A league of na¬ 
tions on like principles would produce like results world wide. And 
while America is a world example of the futility of democracy on 
the principle of racial equality, the divided condition of the 
churches in America on the racial equality question equally illus¬ 
trates the futility of establishing Christianity on racial equality. 
And while this Republican experiment has demonstrated the moral 
impossibility of establishing Christianity, or democracy, or peace, 
or general prosperity on racial equality, it points to the necessity 
and practicability of establishing democracy and peace, with the 
blessings of Christianity, on the principles of race unity of nations 
secured by territorial separtion of races. No one who is satisfied 
with the results of this experiment is a true American citizen. The 
only outcome is an enormous, hideous system of false Americanism. 
It has proved a source of general national degeneration, threaten¬ 
ing national disaster. Thus our nation “follows the way of Cain,” 
and is facing the “vengeance of eternal fire.” (See Gen. 4 :6, 7; 
Jude 7, 11 Verses.) 

RACIAL EQUALITY MADE PRACTICAL 

Racial equality does not rightly consist in the commingling of 
races on the same soil as citizens of the same State sharing equal 
privileges. It naturally and justly consists in international privi¬ 
leges in foreign relations as separate racial governments. How 
could white America, as an enlightened Christian nation, become a 
member of any sort of league, or association of nations, upon any 
dither principle than the territorial separation or races? In the name 
r of our Heavenly Master I ask, is there a Baptist that can fail to 
ttaflre interest in so pure a system of Bible principles or withhold his 
help from a project that promises so much to God’s glory and so 
great a blessing to all the world? 

REASONS FOR COLONIZING NEGROES 

One of three alternates inevitably faces the white race. As 
possible solutions of the race problem. a s (1) Legalized amalgama¬ 
tion of races extended to all the States, as provided in the Four¬ 
teenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the American Constitution, as 
already prevails in the Northern States. The feeble thread that 
separates the Negroes and Caucasians of the Southern States, at the 
ballot box and the marriage altar, is the illiteracy of the Negro . 
The Registration Law, requiring the educational qualification of the 
Negro, is the identical law that gives the Negr 0 the ballot when the 
race meets this requirement . The Negroes see social equality as 

(60) 


the supreme object of their education, and despite every difficulty 
are educating their offspring with the view to merging their race 
into the Caucasian family. To this project, white negrophilists, 
even of the South, are lending their aid to level the white race 
standard to African blood. The majority of the common white 
citizens of America will never admit to their parlors the black male 
to seek the hand of their daughters in courtship and marriage . 
Such a solution must ever be attended with rape, murder and race 
riot. (2) The riext possible solution is a race war of extermina¬ 
tion, which, virtually exists in the form of yearly race riots, lacking 
only in the dignity of a declaration of war. 

NEGROES ARMED 

From one side of the American continent to the other the 
Negroes are organized, and their homes supplied with high power 
guns and pistols, ready for the racial conflict, which they constantly 
expect, and for which they are thus prepared. It is estimated that 
seventy-five per centum of the private arms of the nation is in the 
hands of the Negroes. 

COLORED RACES UNITED 

The YELLOW and BLACK races are united in their demand 
for universal political, social and international equality with the 
Caucasian race.' This calls aloud for a compact organization of 
the Caucasian family of every continent and nation to maintain 
white race interests, and the universal reign of justice, liberty and 
peace. 

AMERICA EMBARRASSED 

With the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendment to our Federal 
Constitution providing for the racial equality of the white and black 
races of America, read and understood by the representatives of the 
Yellow nations in the spirit of the political and social equality of 
the black and white races at our National Capital, is it to be won¬ 
dered at that the Yellow peoples demand their social recognition as 
a race at the hands of white America And if we, as a nation, are 
not capable of solving our own race problem at home, are we con¬ 
sistent in undertaking to solve this problem for foreign nations? 
Is it not necessary that we first put our own race problem in a 
course of NATURAL and SCRIPTURAL solution, and then recom¬ 
mend a like course to other races and nations? And should we not 
begin this imperative task today? 

(3) The other possible solution is the territorial segregation 
of races, for which the True American League contends. Certainly 
this is the only natural, Scriptural, humane solution. Of the three, 
which would liberty loving Baptists choose? 

NEGRO EVANGELIZATION 

Another reason for colonizing the Negroes is the evangelization 
of the Negro natives of Africa. The Negroes of America, educated 

( 61 ) 


iand Christianized, if nationalized in their native land, would edu¬ 
cate, Christianize and civilize the Negroes of the world. 

OBJECT OF NEGRO EDUCATION 

iSo far from education the Negro for American citizenship, 
thus misleading the Negro to seek social recognition through wealth 
and education, with racial equality as the object; the object of self 
government, on its own soil, as a separate race, should be the stated 
■aaibject of Negro education. 

FRIENDLY POLICY 

So far from the territorial separation of the races, and Negro 
-colonization, being unfriendly to the Negro, it is offered in the 
spirit of pity and friendship to this unfortunate race; to give it the 
same liberty on its own native soil that we, as the superior race 
claim for ourselves. It seeks to handle the future fortunes of this 
race by Christian hands. 

STOP RACE WAR 

The ignorant, and the labor monger, have predicted the precip¬ 
itation of race war by an attempt to colonize the Negroes, The 
wise and virtuous have seen the race war already raging at Boston, 
New York City, Atlanta, Cairo, Knoxville, at Washington City our 
"national capital, at various other cities, and recently at Tulsa; and 
.the use of State troops to check the progress of this present race 
war, the direct result of stopping the progress of Negro colonization 
iso nobly begun by Thomas Jefferson, and so wisely advised by Ab- 
iraham Lincoln, America’s wisest and most loyal and patriotic states- 
moen, and by Washington the father of our county. The project of 
the gradual emancipation and colonization of the Negroes did not 
•augment war. The frustration of the project, after the black re¬ 
public of Liberia had thus been planted, did precipitate war between 
"the States; a real race war; and the failure of that well begun work 
iTurmshes all the possibilities of a world race war that now obscure 
four future. Nothing can save our nation from the black and yel¬ 
low peril except immediate steps toward a just division of the earth 
3>etwnen the races. 

BAPTISTS AT ADVANTAGE 

Never in the history of America have the Baptists been at so 
great an advantage as today to do a work for God and humanity, a 
"world wide work, truly worthy of their heritage, and in keeping 
with their divine commission. The president of the United States, 
"the Secretary of State, Thomas E. Waston of Georgia, and other 
great characters at Washington, all Baptists. And whatever it may 
snean, the founder and national president of the True American 
Xeague of the White Brotherhood of the World a Baptist., Does this 
^coincidence in the providence of God suggest nothing to Baptists? 
The Baptists are at advantage to lead in a necessary world reform, 
as never before. The baptists of the North can be readily induced 
"to cooperate with Baptists of the South. The majority of the re- 

( 62 ) 


ligious element of Negroes are Baptists. The white Baptists earn 
promote the organization of the Negroes who desire return to theix- 
native land through the colored Baptists. Thus the two races cant 
be put to work organizing for a friendly separation, just as I ha<£ 
them doing in the years of 1909-11; the black order of True Afri¬ 
cans, a separate organization, cooperating with the white organiza — 
tion, that friendship may endure between the races after the oceans 
divides them. Baptists, white and black, thus cooperating for a: 
final separation of the races, will insure peaceful relations and co¬ 
operation of the two races for a final separation, and thus set a. 
world example for the territorial separation of races in the spirit of 
interracial friendship. 

BAPTISTS FALLING IN LINE 

In September, 1918, the Baptist church at Pine Spring, in- 
Greene County, Tennessee, including the pastor, a man of ability,, 
endorsed True Americanism, and a year later a lodge of the League* 
was organized in their house of worship. In August, 1921, the 
Fifth Sunday Meeting of the Tennessee River Association of Bap¬ 
tists, of Jackson county, Alabama, when in session at Mt. Nebs? 
church after a discussion of the True American Platform, unani¬ 
mously endorsed it. This has been followed by the organization of 
local lodges in the county. But I do not mean to infer that none 
but Baptists take an active part in the League . All Christians of 
other denominations are taking active part with us. Our National 
' Secretary is a Methodist minister of high character, and many citi¬ 
zens who make no pretension to religion are members of the Leagues 
Recent success of Baptist politicians in attaining to official position! 
at Washington has impressed me to appeal to my Baptist brethren: 
to take the lead in this movement, while God holds the door of ©im¬ 
portunity open to us, a rare opportunity for Baptists to make* 
themselves known and felt throughout the world, as champions of 
justice, liberty and peace; and to publish the gospel of Christ 
among all nations; that the world may glorify God as God of the*, 
nations as truly as the Head of the Church; and bring them to sham 
the blessings of Christian Democracy in the State. 

(2) OTHER NATIONAL EVILS, which True Americans op¬ 
pose, are white slavery: legalized lechery: the modern ball room and 
“hug dance”: the desecration of Christmas holidays and the Sab¬ 
bath: the destiny of America in the hands of machine-ring politic¬ 
ians: the division of our common country into a political partisan 
North and South: party strife in our legislative departments: fluct¬ 
uating markets and a gambling system of commerce: oppression of 
labor: extortionate rents, interests and profits: and a competetive 
system of trade. The other evils we oppose are indicated in the. 
general body of this book. 

(63) 


TRUE AMERICANS FAVOR 


The True American League favors (1) Woman’s suffrage and 
the safeguard of woman’s ballot and political privileges against 
abuse: national prohibition with stronger laws for its enforcement: 
law enforcement generally: regenerate the show and the ball room 
or abolish them: better schools, roads and churches: cooperation in 
commerce instead of competition, and conscience in business. The 
things in general which we wish to establish, in place of the things 
we desire to abolish, are suggested in the following platform upon 
which the True American League is founded. 

TRUE AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL PLATFORM 

(1) Profound belief in a Supreme Creator and Ruler. 

(2) Equal rights of man; each race to enjoy its natural 
rights on its own territory, under its own flag and government. 

(3) Separation of Church and State, and freedom of con¬ 
science in matters of religion. 

(4) Political freedom; including freedom of the ballot; free¬ 
dom of speech; and freedom of the press. 

(5) National union of the States and the citizens on the basis 
of the White Race Unity of America, and on the principles of State 
Rights and equal privileges of the citizens in all essential pursuits 
of happiness. 

(6) Education, sound morals, true religion, and perfect liber¬ 
ty essential to a nation’s peace, progress and contentment, and the 
essential bonds of its union. 

(7) An honorable and remunerative system of labor and of 
agriculture, on the basis of stabilized markets, honest speculation, 
and a just and standardized system of commerce. 

PETITION 

To the Honorable Warren G. Harding, President of the United 
States, Washington, £). C.: 

We the undersigned officers and members of the True American 


League, Lodge No., and the citizens of the county of. 

and the State of., do hereby petition your clem¬ 


ency and high sense of our national dignity, as a great white Chris¬ 
tian nation, to favorably and seriously consider the contents of this 
petition and the loyal, patriotic spirit in which it is presented. 

We most respectfully submit our candid opinion that owing to 
our racial complications as a nation, we are in a most embarrassed 
situation for the world conference soon to assemble at our national 
capital. We therefore request, that when the World Conference 
has assembled at Washington, the True American Declaration of the 
Rights of Races, as found in the book entitled Bible Account of The 
Origin Of Races (copies of which have been mailed to your official 
address) be read at the opening session of said World Conference. 
We further petition, that at the earliest date possible, you cause 
this proposition to be put before the Legislative Department of the 





Federal Government and urge that the American Race Problem be 
put in a course of final solution on the policies of Thomas Jefferson 
and Abraham Lincoln; that our nation may be relieved of all em¬ 
barrassment in dealing with yellow race problem at the approaching 
World Conference. 

Against any sort of league, or association of nations, that 
would provide for international racial equality, or abridge American 
Independence, we hereby enter our solemn protest, as true Ameri¬ 
can citizens. America first: then good will toward all other nations 
is the True American Motto. (Signed) John Doe, Pres. T. A. L. 
Lodge No..., Joseph Jones, Sec’y. 

The above form of petition is recommended for all petitionary 
work, with such changes as the occasion requires. After the sig¬ 
nature of the officers of the Lodge, then should follow the signa¬ 
tures of as many citizens, in and out of the Lodge, as can be secur¬ 
ed in the precinct or county. 

IMPORTANT 

Let each lodge, as soon as it is organized, proceed to circulate 
the above petition until the World Conference meets at Washington. 
A whole county may be worked by one lodge, if no more in the 
county. Now is the time to do petitionary work on this vital issue. 
Let every true citizen join this struggle to rescue America from 
race mongrelism. 

ECONOMIC MEASURES . 

True American Economic Policies are written in the True 
American Manual, price 25 cents, postpaid. Address J. P. Cun¬ 
ningham, State Organizer, T. A. L., Scottsboro, Ala., or J. R. 
Lamb. National President T. A. L.., Eufaula, Okla. 

UTILITY OF LOCAL LODGES 

The T. A. L. as a community organization, may take up all 
community interests; as good roads; schools; churches; the regener¬ 
ation of the show; the ball room; co-operation of parents for better 
training of children, and the safeguard of youth against moral 
taint; law enforcement, and every good work. 

As an educational institution, each local lodge is given a course 
in the true science of Ethnology as given in this book; in the history 
and policies of the Democratic, Republican, and Socialist parties 
and in True Americanism as the true science of democratic govern¬ 
ment, that each citizen may vote intelligently and conscientiously. 
Tho Leagne is founded upon principles that are eternal, and deep 
and broad enough for the world’s highest intelligence; and pure 
enough for its most perfect virtues. It pits itself against the 
world’s greatest evils, the most stupendous undertaking since the 
founding of Christianity. Let the Christian world join to make of 
it the greatest political organization on the globe. Then shall God 
comeJnto His own in the civil government of men and the Millen¬ 
nium shall dawn. Humanity in harmony with Divinity is omnipo¬ 
tent 1 in righteous achievement. Let us trust God and go forward, 
He will carry us to victory. 

J. R. LAMB, founder and National President, T. A. L. 

Box 317, Eufaula, Oklahoma. 
(Copyright 1921 by J. R. Lamb.) 












V' 







*}l 


n ’ ; ■ " r-'-j-. ;'i 

Mill 






'• I'- V 

5":" - 

.... .ww.. .. .; -V«c 



'T-: 


w-v : 






1 K : < 


■ 

- ' -v. . ■*•••- - . 



















